Ads
related to: other stuff exists argument example sentence diagram tool 1capterra.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In cases such as these, an "other stuff exists"–type of argument or rationale may provide the necessary precedent for style and phraseology. For instance, upon the sudden death of the actor Heath Ledger in 2008, a discussion broke out about adding "the late" before his name in the article on The Dark Knight , a film in which he had a major role.
Logical form replaces any sentences or ideas with letters to remove any bias from content and allow one to evaluate the argument without any bias due to its subject matter. [1] Being a valid argument does not necessarily mean the conclusion will be true. It is valid because if the premises are true, then the conclusion has to be true.
This page details arguments that are commonly seen in deletion discussions that have been identified as generally unsound and unconvincing. These are arguments that should generally be avoided – or at the least supplemented with a better-grounded rationale for the position taken, whether that be "keep", "delete" or some other objective.
The new title is "When to use or avoid 'other stuff exists' arguments". If the answer to "when to use" was "never", that would be a strange title to use to make things clearer - surely something like "Avoid 'other stuff exists' arguments" would have been far better. That conversation only closed on May 6 - less than two weeks ago.
An argument map or argument diagram is a visual representation of the structure of an argument. An argument map typically includes all the key components of the argument, traditionally called the conclusion and the premises , also called contention and reasons . [ 1 ]
A sentence diagram is a pictorial representation of the grammatical structure of a sentence. The term "sentence diagram" is used more when teaching written language, where sentences are diagrammed. The model shows the relations between words and the nature of sentence structure and can be used as a tool to help recognize which potential ...
Insisting the sources must exist without being able to provide them is generally to be avoided in deletion discussions. Hypothetical examples include: Keep – This is obviously notable, so it could be referenced. Prejudger 01:01, 1 January 2001 (UTC) Keep – There must be plenty of sources. Presumer 01:01, 1 January 2001 (UTC)
Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions: Deletion decisions about non-free content at the English Wikipedia are governed by Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria, thus the strongest arguments are those that explain clearly how they are based upon that policy. WP:AAFFD, WP:AAIFD, WP:AAXFD. Unranked Arguments to make in deletion discussions