When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Knock-and-announce - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knock-and-announce

    Deputy U.S. Marshals during a knock-and-announce procedure. Knock-and-announce, in United States law criminal procedure, is an ancient common law principle, incorporated into the Fourth Amendment, [1] which requires law enforcement officers to announce their presence and provide residents with an opportunity to open the door prior to a search.

  3. Wilson v. Arkansas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilson_v._Arkansas

    Wilson v. Arkansas, 514 U.S. 927 (1995), is a United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court held that the traditional, common-law-derived "knock and announce" rule for executing search warrants must be incorporated into the "reasonableness" analysis of whether the actual execution of the warrant is/was justified under the 4th Amendment.

  4. Semayne's case - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semayne's_case

    Semayne's Case (January 1, 1604) 5 Coke Rep. 91, is an English common law case reported by Sir Edward Coke, who was then the Attorney General of England. In the United States, it is recognized as establishing the " knock-and-announce " rule.

  5. No-knock warrant - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-knock_warrant

    The number of no-knock raids has increased from 3,000 in 1981 to more than 50,000 in 2005, according to Peter Kraska, a criminologist at Eastern Kentucky University in Richmond. [19] In 2010, Kraska estimated 60,000–70,000 no-knock or quick-knock raids were conducted by local police annually, the majority of which were looking for marijuana. [1]

  6. Is Minneapolis' ban on 'no knock' warrants enough to prevent ...

    www.aol.com/news/minneapolis-ban-no-knock...

    A new ban on “no knock” warrants in Minneapolis, enacted in the wake of Amir Locke’s death, is being called one of the strongest of its kind in the nation.

  7. Hudson v. Michigan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hudson_v._Michigan

    Hudson v. Michigan, 547 U.S. 586 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a violation of the Fourth Amendment requirement that police officers knock, announce their presence, and wait a reasonable amount of time before entering a private residence (the knock-and-announce requirement) does not require suppression of the evidence obtained in the ensuing search.

  8. Exigent circumstance - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exigent_circumstance

    In criminal procedure law of the United States, an exigent circumstance allows law enforcement (under certain circumstances) to enter a structure without a search warrant, or if they have a "knock and announce" warrant, allows them to enter without knocking and waiting for the owner's permission to enter.

  9. Federal judge orders ICE to end 'knock and talk' arrests of ...

    www.aol.com/news/federal-judge-orders-ice-end...

    The judgment — issued Wednesday against the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency — involves so-called knock and talk practices. ICE didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.