When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Rule of sevens - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_sevens

    The rule of sevens, in English common law, establishes three age brackets for determining a young person's capacity to be responsible for torts and crimes. Children under the age of seven cannot be held to have capacity, while there is a rebuttable presumption that a minor aged 7 to 14 lacks capacity; for those aged 14 to 21, there is a rebuttable presumption of capacity. [1]

  3. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashwander_v._Tennessee...

    Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 297 U.S. 288 (1936), ... He described the avoidance doctrine as consisting of a "series" of seven rules:

  4. Constitutional avoidance - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_avoidance

    Constitutional avoidance is a legal doctrine of judicial review in United States constitutional law that dictates that United States federal courts should refuse to rule on a constitutional issue if the case can be resolved without involving constitutionality.

  5. Rule of seven - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_seven

    Rule of seven may refer to "The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two", a highly cited paper in psychology; The "half-your-age-plus-seven" rule; Rule of sevens, establishing age brackets for determining capacity to give informed assent or to commit crimes or torts

  6. Nashville Attorney Sues Federal Judges Over Gag Order Barring ...

    www.aol.com/news/nashville-attorney-sues-federal...

    Daniel Horwitz often represents people illegally silenced by the government. This time he says a court violated his First Amendment rights when it gagged him from publicly speaking about a ...

  7. Appeals court spikes Tennessee's bid to get family planning ...

    www.aol.com/lifestyle/appeals-court-spikes...

    Tennessee has been a recipient of the program since it launched in 1970, recently collecting around $7.1 million annually to help nearly 100 clinics provide birth control and basic health care ...

  8. Rogers v. Tennessee - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rogers_v._Tennessee

    Rogers v. Tennessee, 532 U.S. 451 (2001), was a U.S. Supreme Court case holding that there is no due process violation for lack of fair warning when pre-existing common law limitations on what acts constitute a crime, under a more broadly worded statutory criminal law, are broadened to include additional acts, even when there is no notice to the defendant that the court might undo the common ...

  9. Tennessee House overhauls rules — and some lawmakers ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/tennessee-house-overhauls-rules...

    The Tennessee House is warning lawmakers and the crowds watching legislative floor sessions that they could be booted from the room. Tennessee House overhauls rules — and some lawmakers could be ...