When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Criminal Antitrust Anti-Retaliation Act of 2013 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_Antitrust_Anti...

    The Criminal Antitrust Anti-Retaliation Act of 2013 is a bill that would protect whistleblowers who report violations of United States antitrust law.The bill would have whistleblowers first file a retaliation claim with the United States Department of Labor before going to federal court. [1]

  3. No-FEAR Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-FEAR_Act

    The Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 is a United States federal law that seeks to discourage federal managers and supervisors from engaging in unlawful discrimination and retaliation. It is popularly called the No-FEAR Act, and is also known as Public Law 107–174.

  4. Whistleblower protection in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whistleblower_protection...

    The No Fear Act stands for Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act and was made effective in 2002. It discourages federal managers and supervisors from engaging in unlawful discrimination and retaliation and holds them accountable when they violate antidiscrimination and whistleblower protection laws.

  5. Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_301_of_the_Trade...

    Section 301 of the U.S. Trade Act of 1974 (Pub. L. 93–618, 19 U.S.C. § 2411, last amended March 23, 2018 [1]) authorizes the President to take all appropriate action, including tariff-based and non-tariff-based retaliation, to obtain the removal of any act, policy, or practice of a foreign government that violates an international trade agreement or is unjustified, unreasonable, or ...

  6. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burlington_Northern_&_Santa...

    Case history; Prior: White v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railroad Co., 364 F.3d 789 (6th Cir. 2004). Holding; The anti-retaliation provision (42 U. S. C. §2000e–3(a)) under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 does not confine the actions and harms it forbids to those that are related to employment or occur at the workplace.

  7. Your turn: Proposed law would make Illinois landlords guilty ...

    www.aol.com/turn-proposed-law-illinois-landlords...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  8. Harvard University must face narrowed lawsuit over antisemitism

    www.aol.com/news/harvard-university-must-face...

    Both lawsuits accused Harvard of violating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which bars federal funds recipients from allowing discrimination based on race, religion and national origin ...

  9. Murray v. UBS Securities, LLC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murray_v._UBS_Securities,_LLC

    The Act imposes responsibilities upon a public corporation's board of directors, and adds criminal penalties for misconduct. [ 2 ] In order to encourage disclosure, SOX protects whistleblowers who report financial wrongdoing by providing a civil cause of action to protect against retaliation by employers.