Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In approximate arithmetic, such as floating-point arithmetic, the distributive property of multiplication (and division) over addition may fail because of the limitations of arithmetic precision. For example, the identity 1 / 3 + 1 / 3 + 1 / 3 = ( 1 + 1 + 1 ) / 3 {\displaystyle 1/3+1/3+1/3=(1+1+1)/3} fails in decimal arithmetic , regardless of ...
The FOIL method is a special case of a more general method for multiplying algebraic expressions using the distributive law. The word FOIL was originally intended solely as a mnemonic for high-school students learning algebra. The term appears in William Betz's 1929 text Algebra for Today, where he states: [2]
The great variety and (relative) complexity of formulas involving set subtraction (compared to those without it) is in part due to the fact that unlike ,, and , set subtraction is neither associative nor commutative and it also is not left distributive over ,, , or even over itself.
Yet the above logic is still valid to show that if abc = 0 then a = 0 or b = 0 or c = 0 if, instead of letting a = a and b = bc, one substitutes a for a and b for bc (and with bc = 0, substituting b for a and c for b). This shows that substituting for the terms in a statement isn't always the same as letting the terms from the statement equal ...
The algebra of sets is the set-theoretic analogue of the algebra of numbers. Just as arithmetic addition and multiplication are associative and commutative, so are set union and intersection; just as the arithmetic relation "less than or equal" is reflexive, antisymmetric and transitive, so is the set relation of "subset".
The simplest non-distributive lattices are M 3, the "diamond lattice", and N 5, the "pentagon lattice". A lattice is distributive if and only if none of its sublattices is isomorphic to M 3 or N 5; a sublattice is a subset that is closed under the meet and join operations of the original lattice. Note that this is not the same as being a subset ...
When women online started joking about the concept of “girl math,” some people just didn’t get it. So, the conversation turned to “boy math,” and it suddenly wasn’t as lighthearted.
The first occurrence of the problem of counting the number of derangements is in an early book on games of chance: Essai d'analyse sur les jeux de hazard by P. R. de Montmort (1678 – 1719) and was known as either "Montmort's problem" or by the name he gave it, "problème des rencontres." [10] The problem is also known as the hatcheck problem.