Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942), was a landmark United States Supreme Court decision that dramatically increased the regulatory power of the federal government. It remains as one of the most important and far-reaching cases concerning the New Deal, and it set a precedent for an expansive reading of the U.S. Constitution's Commerce Clause for decades to come.
316 U.S. 584 (1942) holding a statute prohibiting the sale of books without a license was constitutional Ex parte Quirin: 317 U.S. 1 (1942) military tribunals for enemy spies Wickard v. Filburn: 317 U.S. 111 (1942) Commerce Clause: Williams et al. v. State of North Carolina: 317 U.S. 287 (1942) Divorce and marriage recognition between states ...
Filburn (1942): In a unanimous decision written by Justice Jackson, the court upheld wheat production quotas established by the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938. The appellant argued that the production quotas overstepped the powers granted to Congress by the Interstate Commerce Clause , as the appellant used the wheat to feed his own animals.
Filburn (1942). [1]: 125 [2] In Wickard a wheat farmer growing wheat solely for animal feed within the confines of his own farm was found to be regulatable because private growth for private consumption was the primary reason for decrease of demand. [1]: 125 [2]
Roscoe Filburn, defendant in the 1942 Supreme Court case of Wickard v. Filburn, which permitted the Federal Government to regulate intrastate commerce under the Interstate Commerce Clause, farmed near 5150 Denlinger Road in what is now urban Trotwood. [20] Trotwood is the alleged childhood home of John Dorian on the television show Scrubs. [21]
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate
Sunday Punch is a 1942 comedy film directed by David Miller and starring William ... Boxers managed by Bassler and trained by Roscoe live in an all-male Brooklyn ...
Filburn (1942) and Gonzales v. Raich (2005). [33] However, in two cases, United States v. Lopez (1995) and United States v. Morrison (2000), the Supreme Court rejected arguments that the commerce clause allowed Congress to "regulate noneconomic activities merely because, through a chain of causal effects, they might have an economic impact". [33]