When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Acquittal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acquittal

    In common law jurisdictions, an acquittal means that the criminal prosecution has failed to prove that the accused is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the charge presented. It certifies that the accused is free from the charge of an offense, as far as criminal law is concerned. The finality of an acquittal is dependent on the jurisdiction.

  3. Presumption of innocence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presumption_of_innocence

    The presumption of innocence is a legal principle that every person accused of any crime is considered innocent until proven guilty.Under the presumption of innocence, the legal burden of proof is thus on the prosecution, which must present compelling evidence to the trier of fact (a judge or a jury).

  4. Guilt (law) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guilt_(law)

    Philosophically, guilt in criminal law reflects a functioning society and its ability to condemn individuals' actions. It rests fundamentally on a presumption of free will, such as from a compatibilist perspective (as in the U.S.A.), in which individuals choose actions and are, therefore, subjected to the external judgement of the rightness or wrongness of those actions.

  5. First officer is convicted of murder since Washington state ...

    www.aol.com/news/first-officer-convicted-murder...

    A jury found a suburban Seattle police officer guilty of murder Thursday in the 2019 shooting death of a homeless man outside a convenience store, marking the first conviction under a Washington ...

  6. Judgment notwithstanding verdict - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judgment_notwithstanding...

    Judgment notwithstanding the verdict, also called judgment non obstante veredicto, or JNOV, is a type of judgment as a matter of law that is sometimes rendered at the conclusion of a jury trial. In American state courts , JNOV is the practice whereby the presiding judge in a civil jury trial may overrule the decision of a jury and reverse or ...

  7. Sentencing Commission Again Proposes Restricting Judges' Use ...

    www.aol.com/news/sentencing-commission-again...

    Judges can sentence defendants for charges they were acquitted of by a jury, a practice that troubles criminal justice advocates, civil liberties groups, and several Supreme Court justices.

  8. Double Jeopardy Clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_Jeopardy_Clause

    If the earlier trial is a fraud, double jeopardy will not prohibit a new trial because the party acquitted has prevented themselves from being placed into jeopardy to begin with. One such case is the trial of Harry Aleman, who was tried and acquitted in 1977 in Cook County, Illinois for the September 1972 death of William Logan. Nearly 20 years ...

  9. Texas appeals court acquits woman convicted of illegally ...

    www.aol.com/news/texas-appeals-court-acquits...

    A federal district court judge in Texas in November granted a motion from the U.S. Justice Department and civil rights groups to block parts of the law requiring officials to reject mail-in ...