When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Shelby County v. Holder - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shelby_County_v._Holder

    Shelby County v. Holder, 570 U.S. 529 (2013), is a landmark decision [1] of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the constitutionality of two provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965: Section 5, which requires certain states and local governments to obtain federal preclearance before implementing any changes to their voting laws or practices; and subsection (b) of Section 4 ...

  3. 2012 term opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_term_opinions_of_the...

    Shelby County v. Holder, 570 U.S. 529: February 27, 2013: June 25, 2013: 75 ... Opinion counts only include the bench opinions listed above; opinions relating to ...

  4. Voter identification laws in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_identification_laws...

    However, in the 2013 case Shelby County v. Holder, the United States Supreme Court struck down section 4(b) of the Act, which contained the formula that determined, based on historic racial discrimination, which states were required to seek preclearance. The court ruled the section unconstitutional, finding that although the provision had been ...

  5. Analysis: John Roberts remains confounded by Donald Trump as ...

    www.aol.com/analysis-john-roberts-remains...

    Roberts’ pattern of favoring GOP interests has been entrenched by his decisions in such cases as the 2013 Shelby County v. Holder (gutting part of the Voting Rights Act) and the 2019 Rucho v.

  6. Voting Rights Act of 1965 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_Rights_Act_of_1965

    [133]: 233 Between 1965 and the Supreme Court's 2013 decision in Shelby County v. Holder to strike down the coverage formula, the attorney general certified 153 local governments across 11 states. [151] Because of time and resource constraints, federal observers are not assigned to every certified jurisdiction for every election.

  7. Voter suppression in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_suppression_in_the...

    In its 2014 Shelby County v. Holder decision, the Supreme Court of the United States allowed jurisdictions with a history of suppression of minority voters to avoid continuing to abide by federal preclearance requirements for changes in voter registration and casting of ballots. Within 24 hours of that ruling, Alabama implemented a previously ...

  8. Opinion: Tennessee lawmakers who want Shelby County DA ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/opinion-tennessee-lawmakers-want...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  9. Amendments to the Voting Rights Act of 1965 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amendments_to_the_Voting...

    In 2013 the Supreme Court, in Shelby County v. Holder , invalidated the Voting Rights Act's coverage formula; several bills have been proposed to create a new coverage formula. In 2014, the Voting Rights Amendments Act was introduced in Congress to create a new coverage formula and amend various other provisions. [ 42 ]