Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Topping the complaint list were cell-phone companies, with 38,420 complaints, up 41% over 2010. After that, the list includes (in order of number of gripes): new-car dealers
These reviews were removed by Metacritic in early September, restoring the games' user scores to their original "generally favorable" and "universal acclaim" scores of 8.7 and 9.0 respectively. [25] Gears 5 was review bombed on Steam primarily by players from China after the game was pulled from sale in that region by its developer, The ...
Steam users left numerous positive reviews for the game in the days that followed, with many thanking the developers for the free game and others expressing appreciation for the cathedral's recreation. [32] Unity, which was released in 2014, had received mixed reviews prior to this event due to bugs and technical problems with the game's launch ...
In 2016, Amazon settled the complaint with the NLRB, denying any wrongdoing but agreeing to post a list at the warehouse of 22 forms of union-busting behavior that the company promised not to engage in, including threatening workers with the loss of a job or other reprisals if they were union supporters, interrogating workers about the union ...
With a legacy of more than 100 years, the Better Business Bureau (BBB) is the go-to watchdog for evaluating businesses and charities. The nonprofit organization maintains a massive database of ...
We collect and review all submitted feedback on a regular basis. You can also vote up existing ideas or post new feedback for the team. To search and vote for an existing idea or feedback: 1. Scroll to the bottom of the AOL Homepage. 2. Click feedback. 3. Enter your feedback and related submissions will generate. 4.
Since this list is very short, it cannot pass a featured list nom, so I'm doing a peer review instead. If whoever reviews this can compare it to the FL criteria, that would be great. Thanks. XR 228 (talk) 03:52, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
There have been documented problems caused by open, anonymous gatherings of people on Wikipedia, such as the writing of vitriol (noted in 2003) or wiki-gangs (noted in July 2005). Another problem is that anyone can edit articles at any time, so people can vandalize articles, as long as they have an account.