Ad
related to: not understanding right and wrong words book summary analysis guide sheet
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The argument from disagreement, also known as the argument from relativity, first observes that there is a lot of intractable moral disagreement: people disagree about what is right and what is wrong. [3] Mackie argues that the best explanation of this is that right and wrong are invented, not objective truths.
Jean Piaget developed two phases of moral development, one common among children and the other common among adults. The first is known as the Heteronomous Phase. [7] This phase, more common among children, is characterized by the idea that rules come from authority figures in one's life such as parents, teachers, and God. [7]
Right and wrong may refer to: Ethics , or moral philosophy, a branch of philosophy that involves systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of right and wrong behavior Morality , the differentiation of intentions, decisions and actions between those that are distinguished as proper and those that are improper
Right & Wrong: How to Decide for Yourself is a book on ethics by Hugh Mackay published in 2004 [1] [2] [3] and again with an updated edition in 2005. References
The book's synopsis describes the work as an "analysis and discussion of moral language and the assumptions underlying its use. This book contends that much of our prescriptive language pertaining to issues such as gambling, abortion, capitol punishment, homosexuality, prostitution, divorce, freedom of speech and expression, pornography, and others, is devoid of moral content."
How Not to Be Wrong: The Power of Mathematical Thinking, written by Jordan Ellenberg, is a New York Times Best Selling [1] book that connects various economic and societal philosophies with basic mathematics and statistical principles. [2] [3]
The book has a satirical title, [20] and was published on 1 December 2008. [21] It became a bestseller within the category of philosophy books in 2013. [22] The book attempts to answer the Frege–Geach Problem, the Fact–Value Gap, and the Open-question argument, [23] although the given answers have been challenged. [24] [6]
William Saletan wrote in The New York Times in 2012 that the book is "a landmark contribution to humanity’s understanding of itself". [4] The book received two reviews in The Guardian: in 2012, Ian Birrell called the book a "compelling study of the morality of those on the left and right [that] reaches some surprising conclusions"; [6] and in ...