Ads
related to: warren county criminal case search by defendant address
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
search and seizure, exclusionary rule Marcus v. Search Warrant: 367 U.S. 717 (1961) Procedural burden on state in seizure of obscene material Hamilton v. Alabama: 368 U.S. 52 (1961) Absence of defendant's counsel at the time of his arraignment violated his rights under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment Hoyt v. Florida: 368 U.S ...
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us
Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (1964), is a United States Supreme Court case holding that criminal suspects have a right to counsel during police interrogations under the Sixth Amendment. [1] The case was decided a year after the court had held in Gideon v. Wainwright that indigent criminal defendants have a right to be provided counsel at ...
Michael Burham was the subject of two massive manhunts since May. In latest, he was caught 9 days after escaping from Warren County Prison on July 6.
“An official criminal investigation of a suspected felony is being conducted by an agency of the United States and a federal grand jury,” said the subpoena, dated June 26. ... Warren, 58, a ...
The Warren Court was the period in the history of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1953 to 1969 when Earl Warren served as the chief justice.The Warren Court is often considered the most liberal court in U.S. history.
It includes United States Supreme Court cases that can also be found in the parent category, or in diffusing subcategories of the parent. Cases of the Supreme Court of the United States decided by the Warren Court , the period during the tenure of Chief Justice Earl Warren (1953–69).
Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264 (1959), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the knowing use of false testimony by a prosecutor in a criminal case violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, even if the testimony affects only the credibility of the witness and does not directly relate to the innocence or guilt of ...