Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Davies v. Mann, 152 Eng. Rep. 588 (1842), was an English case that contained the first formulation of the "last clear chance" or “last opportunity rule” doctrine in negligence law. [2] The case concerned an accident in which a donkey, belonging to the plaintiff, was killed after a wagon, driven by the defendant, collided with it.
Last Clear Chance is a 1959 American short film produced and directed by Robert Carlisle. Sponsored by the Union Pacific Railroad , Last Clear Chance is a safety film intended to warn young drivers to be careful at railroad crossings.
Eggshell skull – Doctrine under which an individual is held liable for all consequences resulting from his actions even if the victim suffers an unusually high levels of damage (i.e., a pre-existing vulnerability or medical condition). The term comes an example argument that if a person had a skull as delicate as the shell of an egg, and an ...
Initially, this was due to the doctrine of coverture. Even after this legal doctrine was abandoned with the adoption of the Married Women's Property Acts , many courts disallowed lawsuits between spouses other than divorce or criminal proceedings for the fear that it would disrupt marital harmony.
The UCFA seeks to establish an apportionment of liability that is more flexible than the all-or-nothing approaches of the contributory negligence and last clear chance doctrines. Under the UCFA, the judgment against tortfeasors can be reduced according to any negligence on behalf of the plaintiff, and multiple tortfeasors held joint and several ...
Last clear chance; Last injurious exposure rule; Law of the case; ... Living tree doctrine; Loss of chance in English law; M. Mailbox rule; Major questions doctrine;
In March 1928, two barges, belonging to the Northern Barge Company, had lifted cargoes of coal at Norfolk, Virginia, for New York.They were towed by tugboats, the "Montrose" and the "Hooper," and were lost off the Jersey Coast on March tenth, in an easterly gale.
An ultrahazardous activity in the common law of torts is one that is so inherently dangerous that a person engaged in such an activity can be held strictly liable for injuries caused to another person, even if the person engaged in the activity took every reasonable precaution to prevent others from being injured.