When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Telephone call recording laws - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_call_recording_laws

    Clark/Melongo on March 20, 2014, which struck down Illinois' two-party consent law, Illinois was a one-party consent state. [60] [61] However, the state legislature amended the statute and, as of December 30, 2014, Illinois is once again a two-party consent state for non-electronic communications. [40] [41]

  3. Smith v. Maryland - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith_v._Maryland

    Smith v. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735 (1979), was a Supreme Court case holding that the installation and use of a pen register by the police to obtain information on a suspect's telephone calls was not a "search" within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and hence no search warrant was required.

  4. Legality of recording by civilians - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_recording_by...

    Laws differ in the United States on how many parties must give their consent before a conversation may be recorded. In 38 states and the District of Columbia, conversations may be recorded if the person is party to the conversation, or if at least one of the people who are party to the conversation have given a third party consent to record the ...

  5. Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Amendment_to_the...

    If a party gives consent to a search, a warrant is not required. There are exceptions and complications to the rule, including the scope of the consent given, whether the consent is voluntarily given, and whether an individual has the right to consent to a search of another's property. [111] In Schneckloth v.

  6. Johnson v. United States (1948 Fourth Amendment case)

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnson_v._United_States...

    Johnson v. United States, 333 U.S. 10 (1948), was a significant United States Supreme Court decision addressing search warrants and the Fourth Amendment.In this case, where federal agents had probable cause to search a hotel room but did not obtain a warrant, the Court declared the search was "unreasonable."

  7. Maryland v. Garrison - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maryland_v._Garrison

    Maryland v. Garrison, 480 U.S. 79 (1987), is a United States Supreme Court case dealing with the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution and the extent of discretion given to police officers acting in good faith. The Court held that where police reasonably believe their warrant was valid during a search, execution of the warrant does ...

  8. Government of Maryland - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_of_Maryland

    The government of Maryland is conducted according to the Maryland Constitution. The United States is a federation ; consequently, the government of Maryland , like the other 49 state governments , has exclusive authority over matters that lie entirely within the state's borders, except as limited by the Constitution of the United States .

  9. Exculpatory evidence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exculpatory_evidence

    Maryland decision, prosecutors in the United States have a duty to disclose exculpatory evidence even if not requested to do so. While the prosecution is not required to search for exculpatory evidence and must disclose only the evidence in its possession, custody, or control, the prosecution's duty is to disclose all information known to any ...