Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The case In re Apple iPod iTunes Antitrust Litigation was filed as a class action in 2005 [9] claiming Apple violated the U.S. antitrust statutes in operating a music-downloading monopoly that it created by changing its software design to the proprietary FairPlay encoding in 2004, resulting in other vendors' music files being incompatible with and thus inoperable on the iPod. [10]
The high cost of subsidizing the iPhone, which has done more to fill Apple's (NAS: AAPL) coffers than those of this country's major mobile carriers, has just taken a bite out of one mobile ...
Apple's claims that Samsung copied the designs of the iPhone and iPad were deemed invalid. [70] The court also ruled that there was "no possibility" that consumers would confuse the smartphones of the two brands. [71] Also in 2011, Apple filed a claim in Australia that Samsung's infringing product should not be sold in that country. [72]
Formerly controlled by parent company CTE Telecom in El Salvador (owned by América Móvil of Mexico), the company started its wireless service as "Personal" around 1999, and later added "ALÓ" with the motto "Facil y Rapido" (Spanish for "Easy and Fast"). In 2009, America Movil unified the brand in Latin America under the name Claro. [8]
Science & Tech. Shopping. Sports
Trump announced the proposals in effort to get the countries to do more about the flow of migrants and fentanyl into the US. Trump visiting the US-Mexico border at Eagle Pass, Texas in February ...
One iPod factory, as an example, employed over 200,000 workers who lived and worked in the factory, and regularly performed more than 60 hours of labor per week. The article also reported that workers made around US$100 per month and were required to live on the premises and pay for rent and food from the company.
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us