When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Correlation does not imply causation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_does_not_imply...

    This differs from the fallacy known as post hoc ergo propter hoc ("after this, therefore because of this"), in which an event following another is seen as a necessary consequence of the former event, and from conflation, the errant merging of two events, ideas, databases, etc., into one.

  3. Neglect of probability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neglect_of_probability

    A: Well, in that case I don't think you should wear a seat belt. Q (interviewer): How do you know when that's gonna happen? A: Like, just hope it doesn't! Q: So, should you or shouldn't you wear seat belts? A: Well, tell-you-the-truth we should wear seat belts. Q: How come? A: Just in case of an accident. You won't get hurt as much as you will ...

  4. Existential fallacy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_fallacy

    In the existential fallacy, one presupposes that a class has members when one is not supposed to do so; i.e., when one should not assume existential import. Not to be confused with the 'Affirming the consequent', as in "If A, then B. B. Therefore A". One example would be: "Every unicorn has a horn on its forehead". It does not imply that there ...

  5. List of fallacies - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies

    A condition X is necessary for Y if X is required for even the possibility of Y. X does not bring about Y by itself, but if there is no X, there will be no Y. For example, oxygen is necessary for fire. But one cannot assume that everywhere there is oxygen, there is fire. A condition X is sufficient for Y if X, by itself, is enough to bring about Y.

  6. Post hoc ergo propter hoc - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post_hoc_ergo_propter_hoc

    Post hoc ergo propter hoc (Latin: 'after this, therefore because of this') is an informal fallacy that states "Since event Y followed event X, event Y must have been caused by event X." It is a fallacy in which an event is presumed to have been caused by a closely preceding event merely on the grounds of temporal succession.

  7. Gambler's fallacy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gambler's_fallacy

    The gambler's fallacy, also known as the Monte Carlo fallacy or the fallacy of the maturity of chances, is the belief that, if an event (whose occurrences are independent and identically distributed) has occurred less frequently than expected, it is more likely to happen again in the future (or vice versa).

  8. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    You can find instant answers on our AOL Mail help page. Should you need additional assistance we have experts available around the clock at 800-730-2563. Should you need additional assistance we have experts available around the clock at 800-730-2563.

  9. Diffusion of responsibility - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffusion_of_responsibility

    In situations which have known to increase anxiety, events have been found to be interpreted more dangerously or inaccurately than they appear. [5] While accurate representation of events may be questionable, there have been extensive analyses on the following events regarding diffusion of responsibility and applications of its concept.