Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Erythrose is a tetrose saccharide with the chemical formula C 4 H 8 O 4.It has one aldehyde group, and is thus part of the aldose family. The natural isomer is D-erythrose; it is a diastereomer of D-threose.
Two older prefixes still commonly used to distinguish diastereomers are threo and erythro. In the case of saccharides, when drawn in the Fischer projection the erythro isomer has two identical substituents on the same side and the threo isomer has them on opposite sides. [ 7 ]
Note that, in this nomenclature, mirror-image isomers differ only in the ' D '/' L ' prefix, even though all their hydroxyls are reversed. The following tables shows the Fischer projections of selected monosaccharides (in open-chain form), with their conventional names. The table shows all aldoses with 3 to 6 carbon atoms, and a few ketoses.
Several isomers exist with the formula H−(C=O)−(CH 2)−(CHOH) 3 −H, but in deoxyribose all the hydroxyl groups are on the same side in the Fischer projection.The term "2-deoxyribose" may refer to either of two enantiomers: the biologically important d-2-deoxyribose and to the rarely encountered mirror image l-2-deoxyribose.
Threose is a four-carbon monosaccharide with molecular formula C 4 H 8 O 4.It has a terminal aldehyde group, rather than a ketone, in its linear chain and so is considered part of the aldose family of monosaccharides.
The differences between cis and trans isomers can be larger if polar bonds are present, as in the 1,2-dichloroethenes. The cis isomer in this case has a boiling point of 60.3 °C, while the trans isomer has a boiling point of 47.5 °C. [ 6 ]
Ribulose is a ketopentose — a monosaccharide containing five carbon atoms, and including a ketone functional group.It has chemical formula C 5 H 10 O 5.Two enantiomers are possible, d-ribulose (d-erythro-pentulose) and l-ribulose (l-erythro-pentulose).
Its strange that this decription of the definition of a diastereomer does not mention E/Z alkene isomers!--175.38.163.188 18:26, 15 August 2013 (UTC) Cis–trans isomerism does not involve chirality. So the E and Z forms are isomers, but not enantiomers, and as such can't be diastereomers either.