When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: prose vs pro per defendant sample

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Pro se legal representation (/ ˌ p r oʊ ˈ s iː / or / ˌ p r oʊ ˈ s eɪ /) means to argue on one's own behalf in a legal proceeding, as a defendant or plaintiff in civil cases, or a defendant in criminal cases, rather than have representation from counsel or an attorney.

  3. Nolle prosequi - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nolle_prosequi

    Nolle prosequi, [a] abbreviated nol or nolle pros, is legal Latin meaning "to be unwilling to pursue". [3] [4] It is a type of prosecutorial discretion in common law, used for prosecutors' declarations that they are voluntarily ending a criminal case before trial or before a verdict is rendered; [5] it is a kind of motion to dismiss and contrasts with an involuntary dismissal.

  4. The U.S. Bill of Rights. Article Three, Section Two, Clause Three of the United States Constitution provides that: . Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have ...

  5. Missouri v. Frye - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missouri_v._Frye

    Missouri v. Galin E. Frye , 566 U.S. 134 (2012), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that attorneys of criminal defendants have the duty to communicate plea bargains offered to the accused.

  6. Faretta v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faretta_v._California

    Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that criminal defendants have a constitutional right to refuse counsel and represent themselves in state criminal proceedings.

  7. Rock v. Arkansas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rock_v._Arkansas

    In Faretta v. California (1975), the United States Supreme Court held that criminal defendants are constitutionally free to decline or reject professional lawyers as legal representation in state-level courts as well as to serve as their own legal counsels in such trials. [2] In that case, the Court noted the lengthy history of the right by ...

  8. Federal prosecution of Donald Trump (election obstruction case)

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_prosecution_of...

    Bolstered by pro-Trump pundits and perceived strong turnouts at rallies, the Trump campaign was confident that they were going to win the election. On Election Day, preliminary surveys at polling places showed Trump in the lead as his supporters were more likely to turn out in person amid the COVID-19 pandemic , but his lead diminished as mail ...

  9. Pro hac vice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pro_hac_vice

    At common law, an attorney not licensed to practice in a particular jurisdiction may be permitted to appear pro hac vice. In the legal field in the United States, pro hac vice (English: / p r oʊ h æ k ˈ v iː tʃ eɪ /) [1] is a practice in common law jurisdictions whereby a lawyer who has not been admitted to practice in a certain jurisdiction is allowed to participate in a particular case ...