Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
εγενετο εν ΒηθαραβαΎ³ – Χ 2. John 1:30. υπερ – π 5, π 66, π 75, Χ* B C* W supp περι – Χ 2 A C 3 L Θ, Ψ, 063, 0101 f 1 f 13 Byz. John 1:34 ο εκλεκτος (the Elect One) – π 5 π 106 vid 187 218 228 1784 it b*, e, ff 2 syr s, c Ambrose Augustine ο εκλεκτος του υιος (the ...
León palimpsest (7th century; extant verses 1 John 1:5–5:21, [25] including the text of the Comma Johanneum . [26] The Muratorian fragment, dated to AD 170, cites chapter 1, verses 1–3 within a discussion of the Gospel of John. [27] Papyrus 9, dating from the 3rd century, has surviving parts of chapter 4, verses 11–12 and 14–17. [28]
The First Epistle of John stands out from the others due to its form, but they're united by language, style, contents, themes, and worldview. [9] The Second and Third Epistles of John are composed as regular greco-roman letters, with greetings and endings, while the First Epistle of John lacks such characteristic markings and instead resembles a sermon or an exhoratory speech.
An Historical Account of Two Notable Corruptions of Scripture by Sir Isaac Newton (published posthumously 1785); Letters to Mr. Archdeacon [George] Travis in answer to his Defence of the Three Heavenly Witnesses by Richard Porson (1790, London); A New Plea for the Authenticity of the Text of the Three Heavenly Witnesses or Porson's Letters to ...
General sigla # beginning with 0: uncial # not beginning with 0: minuscule * superscript: original reading c superscript: scribal correction ms superscript: individual manuscript ...
"Although John 3:16 famously declares that one is saved by believing in the Son, the subsequent verses, particularly John 3:17 [25], delve deeper into the reasons behind this belief, suggesting that it is fundamentally a matter of the heart's affections, loving darkness rather than light. Theologians John Piper and R.C. Sproul emphasize that ...
Irenaeus in Adversus Haereses 3.16.8 (written c. 180), quotes 2 John 7 and 8, and in the next sentence 1 John 4:1, 2, but does not distinguish between 1 and 2 John; he does not quote from 3 John. [46] The Muratorian Canon seems to refer to two letters of John only, [47] though it is possible to interpret it as referring to three.
It is not clear whether the other epistle in question is 2 John or 3 John. Another indication that the author identified the Gospel writer John with two epistles bearing John's name is that when he specifically addresses the epistles of John, he writes, "the Epistle of Jude indeed, and the two belonging to the above mentioned John.