Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In the above example of the usage of exponential mechanism, one can output a synthetic dataset in a differentially private manner and can use the dataset to answer queries with good accuracy. Other private mechanisms, such as posterior sampling, [6] which returns parameters rather than datasets, can be made equivalent to the exponential one. [7]
Accepting natural language questions makes the system more user-friendly, but harder to implement, as there are a variety of question types and the system will have to identify the correct one in order to give a sensible answer. Assigning a question type to the question is a crucial task; the entire answer extraction process relies on finding ...
An end-to-end open-domain question answering. This dataset includes 14,000 conversations with 81,000 question-answer pairs. Context, Question, Rewrite, Answer, Answer_URL, Conversation_no, Turn_no, Conversation_source Further details are provided in the project's GitHub repository and respective Hugging Face dataset card. Question Answering ...
In a civil proceeding or criminal prosecution under the common law or under statute, a defendant may raise a defense (or defence) [a] in an effort to avert civil liability or criminal conviction. A defense is put forward by a party to defeat a suit or action brought against the party, and may be based on legal grounds or on factual claims.
The Stanford team claims their questions are a better test of how legal copilots may perform in a real-world setting than bar exam questions—especially because a lot of datasets of bar exam ...
According to this definition, differential privacy is a condition on the release mechanism (i.e., the trusted party releasing information about the dataset) and not on the dataset itself. Intuitively, this means that for any two datasets that are similar, a given differentially private algorithm will behave approximately the same on both datasets.
Accurate legal information retrieval is important to provide access to the law to laymen and legal professionals. Its importance has increased because of the vast and quickly increasing amount of legal documents available through electronic means. [2] Legal information retrieval is a part of the growing field of legal informatics.
If faced with a binding judicial precedent, a court has a number of ways to respond to it, and may use the following legal devices and mechanisms: [10] Applying - simply following the precedent, and using its ratio in the current case. Approval - showing approval of the earlier case, without necessarily applying it. [11]