When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: np vs pa difference

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. P versus NP problem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P_versus_NP_problem

    NP can be defined similarly using nondeterministic Turing machines (the traditional way). However, a modern approach uses the concept of certificate and verifier. Formally, NP is the set of languages with a finite alphabet and verifier that runs in polynomial time. The following defines a "verifier": Let L be a language over a finite alphabet, Σ.

  3. Nondeterministic Turing machine - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nondeterministic_Turing...

    One of the most important open problems in theoretical computer science is the P versus NP problem, which (among other equivalent formulations) concerns the question of how difficult it is to simulate nondeterministic computation with a deterministic computer.

  4. Pseudo-polynomial time - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudo-polynomial_time

    An NP-complete problem with known pseudo-polynomial time algorithms is called weakly NP-complete. An NP-complete problem is called strongly NP-complete if it is proven that it cannot be solved by a pseudo-polynomial time algorithm unless P = NP. The strong/weak kinds of NP-hardness are defined analogously.

  5. NP (complexity) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NP_(complexity)

    co-NP contains those problems that have a simple proof for no instances, sometimes called counterexamples. For example, primality testing trivially lies in co-NP, since one can refute the primality of an integer by merely supplying a nontrivial factor. NP and co-NP together form the first level in the polynomial hierarchy, higher only than P.

  6. NP-hardness - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NP-hardness

    If P and NP are different, then there exist decision problems in the region of NP that fall between P and the NP-complete problems. (If P and NP are the same class, then NP-intermediate problems do not exist because in this case every NP-complete problem would fall in P, and by definition, every problem in NP can be reduced to an NP-complete ...

  7. P/poly - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P/poly

    One of the most interesting reasons that P/poly is important is the property that if NP is not a subset of P/poly, then P ≠ NP. This observation was the center of many attempts to prove P ≠ NP. It is known that for a random oracle A, NP A is not a subset of P A /poly with probability 1. [1] P/poly is also used in the field of cryptography.

  8. NP-completeness - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NP-completeness

    A problem is NP-complete if it is both in NP and NP-hard. The NP-complete problems represent the hardest problems in NP. If some NP-complete problem has a polynomial time algorithm, all problems in NP do. The set of NP-complete problems is often denoted by NP-C or NPC.

  9. Strong NP-completeness - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strong_NP-completeness

    Assuming P ≠ NP, the following are true for computational problems on integers: [5] If a problem is weakly NP-hard, then it does not have a weakly polynomial time algorithm (polynomial in the number of integers and the number of bits in the largest integer), but it may have a pseudopolynomial time algorithm (polynomial in the number of integers and the magnitude of the largest integer).