When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Apprendi v. New Jersey - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apprendi_v._New_Jersey

    Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision with regard to aggravating factors in crimes. The Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial, incorporated against the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, prohibited judges from enhancing criminal sentences beyond statutory maxima based on facts other than those decided by the ...

  3. 2000 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Antonin Scalia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000_term_United_States...

    The 2000 term of the Supreme Court of the United States began October 2, 2000, and concluded September 30, 2001. This was the fifteenth term of Associate Justice Antonin Scalia 's tenure on the Court.

  4. Antonin Scalia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonin_Scalia

    In the 2000 case of Apprendi v. New Jersey, Scalia wrote a concurrence to the Court's majority opinion that struck down a state statute that allowed the trial judge to increase the sentence if the judge found the offense was a hate crime.

  5. Alleyne v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alleyne_v._United_States

    Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (2013), was a United States Supreme Court case that decided that, in line with Apprendi v. New Jersey (2000), all facts that increase a mandatory minimum sentence for a criminal offense must be submitted to and found true by a jury, not merely determined to be true at a judge's discretion.

  6. Justice Scalia must be rolling over in his grave at the ...

    www.aol.com/justice-scalia-must-rolling-over...

    John Roberts and Neil Gorsuch suggested the famous originalist “began to express doubts” about the watershed regulation case. That’s simply not true. | Opinion

  7. Blakely v. Washington - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blakely_v._Washington

    The Apprendi rule ensures that "the judge's authority to sentence derives wholly from the jury's verdict. Without that restriction, the jury would not exercise the control that the Framers intended." Justice Scalia, as the author of the majority opinion, reasoned that those who reject Apprendi "are resigned to one of two alternatives." First, a ...

  8. List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 530

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Case name Citation Date decided Hartford Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Union Planters Bank, N. A. 530 U.S. 1: 2000: Raleigh v. Illinois Dept. of Revenue

  9. ESPN's Kirk Herbstreit: Indiana 'was not a team that should ...

    www.aol.com/sports/espns-kirk-herbstreit-indiana...

    Indiana may not have been one of the very best teams in college football, but a team that goes 11-1 in a power conference was always going to be a foregone conclusion to make the 12-team College ...