When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Sentencing in England and Wales - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentencing_in_England_and...

    This involves assessing the aggravating and mitigating features of the offence. Courts can take into account any fact considered relevant as aggravating or mitigating, [10] and many are set out in sentencing guidelines. The Sentencing Act sets out a number of statutory aggravating factors including:

  3. United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Federal...

    The Guidelines are the product of the United States Sentencing Commission, which was created by the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. [3] The Guidelines' primary goal was to alleviate sentencing disparities that research had indicated were prevalent in the existing sentencing system, and the guidelines reform was specifically intended to provide for determinate sentencing.

  4. Criminal sentencing in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_sentencing_in_the...

    Between 1973 and 2012, women comprised only 2.1% of death sentences imposed at trial and merely 0.9% of persons executed. [23] Women who are sentenced to death at trial are more likely to receive executive clemency than their male counterparts, despite their crime having more aggravating factors that may increase sentencing outcomes. [24]

  5. List of punishments for murder in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_punishments_for...

    Second Degree Murder if aggravating factors outweigh any mitigating factors Life (minimum of any number of years, but not less than 20 years, only an option for anyone under 18) or life without parole First Degree Murder if mitigating factors outweigh any aggravating factors Life (minimum of 15–35 years) First Degree Murder

  6. List of United States Supreme Court opinions involving ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Oregon v. Guzek, 546 U.S. 517 (2006) – States may limit the evidence of innocence a defendant may present at his sentencing hearing to evidence already presented at his trial. Kansas v. Marsh, 548 U.S. 163 (2006) – Imposing the death penalty when mitigating and aggravating factors are in equipoise is constitutional. Kansas v.

  7. Hurst v. Florida - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurst_v._Florida

    Hurst v. Florida, 577 U.S. 92 (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court, in an 8–1 ruling, applied the rule of Ring v. Arizona [1] to the Florida capital sentencing scheme, holding that the Sixth Amendment requires a jury to find the aggravating factors necessary for imposing the death penalty.

  8. United States constitutional sentencing law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States...

    Aggravating factors must be found by a jury. [17] Aggravating factors cannot be vague. [18] The sentencing decision-maker must have the authority to consider all mitigating factors. [19] Fourth, the Clause requires certain additional procedural rules in capital cases. For example, the jury must be permitted to consider a lesser included offense ...

  9. Criminal sentencing in Canada - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_sentencing_in_Canada

    There are also specific aggravating factors for organizations found guilty of an offence. In addition, some offences have their own specific aggravating factors. For example, section 255.1 of the Criminal Code makes it an aggravating factor if a person commits a drinking and driving offence when their blood alcohol concentration is in excess of ...