Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Out of the 6,933,633 articles on Wikipedia, 40,716 are categorized as good articles (about 0.59% or one in 170), which are listed below. An additional 6,645 are listed as featured articles (about 1 in 1,050) and 4,534 as featured lists (about 1 in 1,530). Because articles are only included in one category, a good article that has been promoted ...
Research topics have included the reliability of the encyclopedia and various forms of systemic bias; social aspects of the Wikipedia community (including administration, policy, and demographics); the encyclopedia as a dataset for machine learning; and whether Wikipedia trends might predict or influence human behaviour.
Wikipedia:Point of view – At any given time, a Wikipedia article may not have a neutral point of view. Wikipedia:Reference desk – our help desk, feel free to ask any questions; Wikipedia:Replies to common objections; Wikipedia:Researching Wikipedia – academic research about Wikipedia, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikidemia – a related project
Integrating Wikipedia Articles and Images into an Information Resource for Radiology Patients: 2018-11-06 Wikipedia English Wikipedia information resource: Sequential Supervised Learning for Hypernym Discovery from Wikipedia: 2011 Wikipedia supervised learning: Debating reliable sources: writing the history of the Vietnam War on Wikipedia: 2015 ...
A good topic is a collection of inter-related articles that are of a good quality (though not all are featured articles). A good topic represents Wikipedia's quality-rated content by thoroughly covering all parts of that topic through several good articles that share a similar structure and are well-linked with each other.
Wikipedia's scope includes all human knowledge, so we have articles about topics as diverse as science, local history, and popular culture. Volunteers write Wikipedia articles as summaries of the best information on a topic, by summarizing the information found in reliable publications .
Wikipedia has been the center of a much heated and critical debate in academia pertaining to the relevance, accuracy, and effectiveness of using information found online in academic research, especially in places where information is constantly being created, revised, and deleted by people of various backgrounds, ranging from experts to curious learners.
This is notable for being an actual Wikipedia article that went through a peer-review process and was published in an academic journal, rather than being a paper based on Wikipedia article(s). Koo M (2014). "Complementary and Alternative Medicine on Wikipedia: Opportunities for Improvement". Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine.