When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. No one is on the fence about the 'obscenity' in Griffith Park ...

    www.aol.com/news/no-one-fence-obscenity-griffith...

    The bill came to $45,589. On Thursday evening, the arguments for and against the fences got fleshed out at a meeting of the Griffith Park Advisory Board. “No one likes a fence, but fences are ...

  3. School librarians in Ohio could face felony charges if kids ...

    www.aol.com/school-librarians-ohio-could-face...

    A new Ohio bill would allow prosecutors to charge school librarians with a felony if children access an "obscene" book or movie. Current Ohio law prohibits selling and distributing "obscene ...

  4. US Rep. Nancy Mace accuses former fiancé, his business ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/us-rep-nancy-mace-accuses...

    (Reuters) - U.S. Representative Nancy Mace, in a graphic speech on the House floor, has accused her former fiancé and three other men of drugging and raping her and other women, and filming and ...

  5. United States obscenity law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_obscenity_law

    United States obscenity law deals with the regulation or suppression of what is considered obscenity and therefore not protected speech or expression under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. In the United States, discussion of obscenity typically relates to defining what pornography is obscene. Issues of obscenity arise at ...

  6. Obscenity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obscenity

    An obscenity is any utterance or act that strongly offends the prevalent morality of the time. [1] It is derived from the Latin obscēnus , obscaenus , "boding ill; disgusting; indecent", of uncertain etymology. [ 2 ]

  7. FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc. (2012) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FCC_v._Fox_Television...

    Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc., 567 U.S. 239 (2012), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States regarding whether the U.S. Federal Communications Commission's scheme for regulating speech is unconstitutionally vague.

  8. Pandering obscenity involving a minor gets Zanesville man 8 ...

    www.aol.com/pandering-obscenity-involving-minor...

    Charles E. Cawley, 43, was indicted in December with three counts of pandering obscenity involving a minor, all second-degree felonies. He was sentenced to an aggregate indefinite term of 8 to 12 ...

  9. Communications Decency Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_Decency_Act

    A separate challenge to the provisions governing obscenity, known as Nitke v. Gonzales, was rejected by a federal court in New York in 2005. The Supreme Court summarily affirmed that decision in 2006. Congress has made two narrower attempts to regulate children's exposure to Internet indecency since the Supreme Court overturned the CDA.