Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) listed the first-ever standardized 'exchange traded' forward contracts in 1864, which were called futures contracts. This contract was based on grain trading, and started a trend that saw contracts created on a number of different standardized futures contracts based on commodities , as well as a number of ...
Title 31 of the United States Code outlines the role of the money and finance in the United States Code. Legislative history. The title was codified September 13, ...
A retention of title clause (also called a reservation of title clause or a Romalpa clause in some jurisdictions) is a provision in a contract for the sale of goods that the title to the goods remains vested in the seller until the buyer fulfils certain obligations (usually payment of the purchase price).
Accordingly, courts will often read implied-in-fact or implied-in-law terms into the contract, placing duties on the promisor. For instance, if a promisor promises to give away a third of his earnings for the year and earns nothing, he has no actual obligation to do anything.
If the subject of the contract is destroyed (such as through merging the contract subject and the contract obligation), then the contract may be made void. [1] Extinguishment occurs in a variety of contracts, such as land contracts (common, copyhold), debts, rents, and right of ways. [1]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chicago_Title&oldid=327944721"This page was last edited on 25 November 2009, at 22:58 (UTC). (UTC).
[1] However, in evaluating the U.S. government's allegations that the Chicago Board of Trade's rules on grain prices violated the Act, the Supreme Court rejected a strict interpretation of its language: "The true test of legality is whether the restraint imposed is such as merely regulates and perhaps thereby promotes competition or whether it ...
A take-or-pay contract, or a take-or-pay clause within a contract, is a payment obligation agreed between a business customer and its supplier. With this kind of contract, the customer either takes the product from the supplier or pays the supplier a penalty. For any product the company takes, it agrees to pay the supplier a certain price, say ...