When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: miranda v arizona arrest case

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Miranda v. Arizona - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miranda_v._Arizona

    Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that law enforcement in the United States must warn a person of their constitutional rights before interrogating them, or else the person's statements cannot be used as evidence at their trial.

  3. Ernesto Miranda - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernesto_Miranda

    Ernesto Arturo Miranda (March 9, 1941 – January 31, 1976) was an American laborer whose criminal conviction was set aside in the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona, which ruled that criminal suspects must be informed of their right against self-incrimination and their right to consult with an attorney before being questioned ...

  4. Miranda warning - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miranda_warning

    The concept of "Miranda rights" was enshrined in U.S. law following the 1966 Miranda v. Arizona Supreme Court decision, which found that the Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights of Ernesto Arturo Miranda had been violated during his arrest and trial for armed robbery, kidnapping, and rape of a young woman.

  5. Custodial interrogation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Custodial_interrogation

    Per Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 444 (1966), [1] "custodial interrogation [refers to] questioning initiated by law enforcement officers after a person has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way." The United States Supreme Court has clarified that a person is being subjected to a ...

  6. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Warren Court

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    the Sam Sheppard case, defendant's right to a fair trial vs. freedom of the press: Miranda v. Arizona: Criminal procedure: 384 U.S. 436 (1966) self-incrimination ("right to remain silent") Federal Trade Commission v. Dean Foods Co. 384 U.S. 597 (1966)

  7. Medical entrepreneur and her DJ husband arrested over $900m ...

    www.aol.com/medical-entrepreneur-her-dj-husband...

    A wealthy power couple from Arizona found themselves in handcuffs just months after getting married, for their role in a $900 million Medicare fraud scheme, according to the Department of Justice. ...

  8. List of landmark court decisions in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

    Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) Police must advise criminal suspects of their rights under the Constitution to remain silent, to consult with a lawyer, and to have one appointed to them if they are indigent. A police interrogation must stop if the suspect states that he or she wishes to remain silent.

  9. Mistaken identity? Woman says she was wrongly accused, arrested

    www.aol.com/news/2014-07-29-mistaken-identity...

    RITTMAN, Ohio - Ashley Brown was eight months pregnant when she was arrested on drug charges last November for a case in which her only real crime may have been having a very common name. Brown ...