Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In short, a hypothesis is testable if there is a possibility of deciding whether it is true or false based on experimentation by anyone. This allows anyone to decide whether a theory can be supported or refuted by data. However, the interpretation of experimental data may be also inconclusive or uncertain.
For example, a new technology or theory might make the necessary experiments feasible. Scientific hypothesis A trial solution to a problem is commonly referred to as a hypothesis—or, often, as an " educated guess " [ 14 ] [ 2 ] —because it provides a suggested outcome based on the evidence.
An example of Neyman–Pearson hypothesis testing (or null hypothesis statistical significance testing) can be made by a change to the radioactive suitcase example. If the "suitcase" is actually a shielded container for the transportation of radioactive material, then a test might be used to select among three hypotheses: no radioactive source ...
Scientific inquiry includes creating a testable hypothesis through inductive reasoning, testing it through experiments and statistical analysis, and adjusting or discarding the hypothesis based on the results. [1] [2] [3] Although procedures vary between fields, the underlying process is often similar.
Software testability is the degree to which a software artifact (e.g. a software system, module, requirement, or design document) supports testing in a given test context. . If the testability of an artifact is high, then finding faults in the system (if any) by means of testing is easi
Auxiliary hypotheses that are independently testable: "An auxiliary hypothesis ought to be testable independently of the particular problem it is introduced to solve, independently of the theory it is designed to save." (For example, the evidence for the existence of Neptune is independent of the anomalies in Uranus's orbit.)
This is the problem of induction. Suppose we want to put the hypothesis that all swans are white to the test. We come across a white swan. We cannot validly argue (or induce) from "here is a white swan" to "all swans are white"; doing so would require a logical fallacy such as, for example, affirming the consequent. [3]
Peirce held that, as a matter of research method, an explanatory hypothesis is judged and selected [13] for research because it offers to economize and expedite the process of inquiry, [14] by being testable and by further factors in the economy of hypotheses: low cost, intrinsic value (instinctive naturalness and reasoned likelihood), and ...