Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Using liquid methane and liquid oxygen as propellants is sometimes called methalox ... 3.30 3692 1.10 1889 F 2:O 2 70:30 RP-1: 3377 3.84 4361 1.20 2106 3955 3.84 ...
One of the most efficient mixtures, oxygen and hydrogen, suffers from the extremely low temperatures required for storing liquid hydrogen (around 20 K or −253.2 °C or −423.7 °F) and very low fuel density (70 kg/m 3 or 4.4 lb/cu ft, compared to RP-1 at 820 kg/m 3 or 51 lb/cu ft), necessitating large tanks that must also be lightweight and ...
Engine Origin Designer Vehicle Status Use Propellant Power cycle Specific impulse (s) [a] Thrust (N) [a] Chamber pressure (bar) Mass (kg) Thrust: weight ratio [b] Oxidiser: fuel ratio
Russia is also working to switch the Soyuz-2 from RP-1 to "naftil" [10] or "naphthyl". [11] [12] After the RP-1 standard, RP-2 was developed. The primary difference is an even lower sulfur content. However, as most users accept RP-1, there was little incentive to produce and stock a second, even rarer and more expensive formulation.
Dinitrogen tetroxide (N 2 O 4) and hydrazine (N 2 H 4), MMH, or UDMH. Used in military, orbital, and deep space rockets because both liquids are storable for long periods at reasonable temperatures and pressures. N 2 O 4 /UDMH is the main fuel for the Proton rocket, older Long March rockets (LM 1-4), PSLV, Fregat, and Briz-M upper stages.
LOX has a density of 1.14 g/ml, while on the other hand, hypergolic oxidizers such as nitric acid or nitrogen tetroxide have a density of 1.55 g/ml and 1.45 g/ml respectively. LH2 fuel offers extremely high performance, yet its density only warrants its usage in the largest of rocket stages, while mixtures of hydrazine and UDMH have a density ...
RD-170 comparable Russian RP-1/LOX engine with four combustion chambers. F-1 comparable RP-1/LOX engine. Raptor comparable methane engine. Proton rocket - successor of one of universal rocket series. N1 ("Carrier #1") - alternative rocket for Soviet lunar projects.
The engineering solution was to cut off the lower 1.2 m (4 ft) of the nozzle and launch two days later, as the extra performance that would have been gained from the longer nozzle was not necessary to meet the objectives of the mission. The modified engine successfully placed the second stage into an orbit of 11,000 km (6,800 mi) altitude. [24]