Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Philippines, being then a territory of the United States, incorporated into Act 666 principles upon which the U.S. trademark law was founded on. [ 7 ] Republic Act No. 166 repealed Act 666 in 1946, [ 7 ] and was itself expressly repealed on January 1, 1998 when Republic Act No. 8293 [ 1 ] was enacted in compliance with the WTO TRIPS Agreement.
An accounting of profits is proper in a trademark infringement case only where the defendant engages in willful infringement, meaning that the defendant attempted to exploit the value of an established name of another. [45] Alternatively, a plaintiff may recover damages incurred if they show a reasonable forecast of lost profits.
An intellectual property (IP) infringement is the infringement or violation of an intellectual property right. There are several types of intellectual property rights, such as copyrights, patents, trademarks, industrial designs, plant breeders rights [1] and trade secrets. Therefore, an intellectual property infringement may for instance be one ...
Patent infringement typically is caused by using or selling a patented invention without permission from the patent holder, i.e. from the patent owner. The scope of the patented invention or the extent of protection [72] is defined in the claims of the granted patent. There is safe harbor in many jurisdictions to use a patented invention for ...
Under Subsection 187.1 of the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines, [4] the reproduction of a published work shall be permitted without the owner's authorization given that the reproduction was made for research purposes. The permission granted here shall not extend to: A work of architecture in the form of building or other construction
Brand protection is the process and set of actions that a right holder undertakes to prevent third parties from using its intellectual property without permission, as this may cause loss of revenue and, usually more importantly, destroys brand equity, reputation and trust.
[4] [5] In the Bobbs-Merrill case, the publisher, Bobbs-Merrill, had inserted a notice in its books that any retail sale at a price under $1.00 would constitute an infringement of its copyright. The defendants, who owned Macy's department store, disregarded the notice and sold the books at a lower price without Bobbs-Merrill's consent. The ...
Patent infringement, using or selling a patented invention without permission from the patent holder, typically for commercial purposes; Trademark infringement, a violation of the exclusive rights attaching to a trademark without the authorization of the trademark owner or licensees