Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Quine's and Putnam's arguments have also been influential outside philosophy of mathematics, inspiring indispensability arguments in other areas of philosophy. For example, David Lewis , who was a student of Quine, used an indispensability argument to argue for modal realism in his 1986 book On the Plurality of Worlds .
Putnam considers the argument in the two last sections as independent of the first four, and at the same time as Putnam criticizes Quine, he also emphasizes his historical importance as the first top rank philosopher to both reject the notion of apriority and sketch a methodology without it. [3]
In the philosophy of mathematics, he and his Harvard colleague Hilary Putnam developed the Quine–Putnam indispensability argument, an argument for the reality of mathematical entities. [11] He was the main proponent of the view that philosophy is not conceptual analysis , but continuous with science; it is the abstract branch of the empirical ...
Federal employees like him who are taking the buyout are the highly productive and marketable people that federal agencies cannot afford to lose, he said. Even if his resignation is blocked, Poole ...
Another challenge: Federal employees skew older, and it’s often harder for these workers to find new employment, Pollak said. Some 28% are ages 55 and older, compared to just under 24% of the ...
According to Putnam, Quine's version of the argument was an argument for the existence of abstract mathematical objects, while Putnam's own argument was simply for a realist interpretation of mathematics, which he believed could be provided by a "mathematics as modal logic" interpretation that need not imply the existence of abstract objects.
The federal civil service system is designed to ensure merit-based hiring and firing, and protects employees from arbitrary or unjust terminations, with federal employees overseeing essential ...
The explanatory indispensability argument is an altered form of the Quine–Putnam indispensability argument [3] first raised by W. V. Quine and Hilary Putnam in the 1960s and 1970s. [4] The Quine–Putnam indispensability argument supports the conclusion that mathematical objects exist with the idea that mathematics is indispensable to the ...