Ads
related to: ayodhya verdict case name search freecourtrec.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
- Public Court Records
See Public Public Court Records
Millions Of Citizens. Search Today!
- Court Case Records
Get Info On Any Public Court Case
Reveal Incriminating Details Today!
- Criminal Court Records
See If Anyone Has Been To Court
Browse Up To Date Court Records
- County Court Records
Easily Search Court Records Online
Just Enter A Name & Choose A State
- State Court Record Search
Search Our Database For Court Info
Answer Your Burning Questions Now!
- Court Criminal Check
Court Records, Millions Of Citizens
Available In Our Database. Search
- Public Court Records
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The final judgement in the Ayodhya dispute was declared by the Supreme Court of India on 9 November 2019. [4] The Supreme Court ordered the disputed land (2.77 acres) to be handed over to a trust (to be created by the government of India) to build the Ram Janmabhoomi (revered as the birthplace of Hindu deity, Rama) temple.
The Allahabad High Court pronounces its verdict on four title suits relating to the Ayodhya dispute on 30 September 2010. Ayodhya land to be divided into three parts. ⅓ goes to Ram Lalla represented by Hindu Maha Sabha, ⅓ to Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Waqf Board, ⅓ goes to Nirmohi Akhara. [103] 2010: December
Noted lawyer Rajeev Dhawan said the Ramjanmabhoomi-Babri Masjid case had taken a wrong turn and the ASI report had no historical or moral significance and the conclusions were based on political considerations. However, Mr. Dhawan said, "The legal case did not relate to the question of whether a temple existed on the site or not". [41]
Historical evidence to support this belief is scarce, and several historians have stated that Ayodhya became a religious centre with a number of temples only in the 18th century AD. [3] [4] [5] Following the Mughal conquest of the region in 1528, Mughal general Mir Baqi built a mosque named the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya. According to hearsay ...
The trust was awarded the disputed 2.77-acre land as well as the 67.703-acre land acquired under the Acquisition of Certain Area at Ayodhya Act, 1993 following the Supreme Court verdict in this regard. [9] The central government nominated the 12 of 15 members of the trust.
In May 2010, the Supreme Court restrained trial courts from pronouncing judgments in nine sensitive riot cases, including the Godhra train incident. The trial was completed in September 2010, but the verdict could not be delivered due to the Supreme Court's stay. [61]
Ad
related to: ayodhya verdict case name search freecourtrec.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month