Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Raj Narain (1975 AIR 865, 1975 SCR (3) 333) was a 1975 case heard by the Allahabad High Court that found the Prime Minister of India Indira Gandhi guilty of electoral malpractices. The ruling on the case that had been filed by the defeated opposition candidate, Raj Narain , Justice Jagmohanlal Sinha invalidated Gandhi's win and barred her from ...
On 25 February 1948, the Chief Court of Oudh was amalgamated with the High Court of Allahabad. Until 2000, what is now called Uttarakhand was part of Uttar Pradesh, and was therefore subject to the jurisdiction of Allahabad High Court. When the new state was created, Allahabad High Court ceased to have jurisdiction over the districts in it.
Acting Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court; In office 22 November 2023 – 4 February 2024: Appointed by: Droupadi Murmu: Personal details; Born 9 October 1964 (age 60) Nationality: Indian: Alma mater: Lucknow University
The Akhil Bharatiya Hindu Mahasabha and Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Waqf Board moved to the Supreme Court of India, challenging part of the Allahabad High Court's verdict. [123] [124] 2011: 9 May: Supreme Court of India stayed the High Court order splitting the disputed site in three parts and said that status quo will remain. 2019 6 August
The Calcutta High Court is the oldest high court in the country, brought into existence on 14 May 1862. [2] High courts that handle numerous cases of a particular region have permanent benches established there. Benches are also present in states which come under the jurisdiction of a court outside its territorial limits.
Arun Bhansali (born 15 October 1967) is an Indian Judge. He is serving as the Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court since 5 February 2024. He is also the Member of Advisory - cum - Consultative panel for National Legal Service Authority (NALSA) and the Member of, National Court Management System Committee (NCMSC).
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Pages for logged out editors learn more
Ban on dissenting media under the Section 9 (1-A) of the Madras Maintenance of Public Order Act, 1949 struck down as unconstitutional. This in-turn led to formulation of the 1st amendment of the Constitution of India which clarified public order can form grounds for reasonable restrictions of free speech. Stanislaus v. State of Madhya Pradesh ...