Ads
related to: los angeles civil case summary judgment examples for court orders in illinoiscourtrec.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
uslegalforms.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court.Written by Associate Justice William Rehnquist, the decision of the Court held that a party moving for summary judgment need show only that the opposing party lacks evidence sufficient to support its case.
Summary judgment in the United States applies only in civil cases. It does not apply to criminal cases to obtain a pretrial judgment of conviction or acquittal, in part because a criminal defendant has a constitutional right to a jury trial. [4] Some federal and state-court judges publish general guidelines and sample summary judgment forms.
The Superior Court of Los Angeles County and Charles Lee, Real Party in Interest: Citation(s) 4 Cal.5th 903, 416 P.3d 1, 232 Cal.Rptr.3d 1: Case history; Prior history: Review granted from 179 Cal.Rptr.3d 69: Holding; A hiring entity bears the burden of establishing that a worker is an independent contractor not subject to wage order protections.
Standard for summary judgment: Celotex Corp. v. Catrett: 477 U.S. 317 (1986) Standard for summary judgment Ford v. Wainwright: 477 U.S. 399 (1986) Competence to be executed Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court: 478 U.S. 1 (1986) First Amendment free press guarantee and the right to a transcript of a preliminary hearing Bowers v. Hardwick: 478 ...
Held that state taxpayers do not have standing to challenge to state tax laws in federal court. 9–0 Massachusetts v. EPA: 2007: States have standing to sue the EPA to enforce their views of federal law, in this case, the view that carbon dioxide was an air pollutant under the Clean Air Act. Cited Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Co. as precedent ...
Los Angeles County: 482 U.S. 304 (1987) substantive due process, temporary taking O'Lone v. Estate of Shabazz: 482 U.S. 342 (1987) not a violation of the Free Exercise Clause to deprive an inmate of attending a religious service for "legitimate penological interests." Board of Airport Commissioners of Los Angeles v. Jews for Jesus, Inc. 482 U.S ...