When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Logical consequence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_consequence

    The Polish logician Alfred Tarski identified three features of an adequate characterization of entailment: (1) The logical consequence relation relies on the logical form of the sentences: (2) The relation is a priori, i.e., it can be determined with or without regard to empirical evidence (sense experience); and (3) The logical consequence ...

  3. List of logic symbols - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_logic_symbols

    definition: is defined as metalanguage:= means "from now on, is defined to be another name for ." This is a statement in the metalanguage, not the object language. The notation may occasionally be seen in physics, meaning the same as :=.

  4. Material conditional - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Material_conditional

    Material implication does not closely match the usage of conditional sentences in natural language. For example, even though material conditionals with false antecedents are vacuously true , the natural language statement "If 8 is odd, then 3 is prime" is typically judged false.

  5. Implication - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implication

    Implicature, what is suggested in an utterance, even though neither expressed nor strictly implied; Implicational universal or linguistic universal, a pattern that occurs systematically across natural languages

  6. IMPLY gate - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IMPLY_gate

    IMPLY can be denoted in algebraic expressions with the logic symbol right-facing arrow (→). Logically, it is equivalent to material implication, and the logical expression ¬A v B. There are two symbols for IMPLY gates: the traditional symbol and the IEEE symbol. For more information see Logic gate symbols.

  7. Presupposition - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presupposition

    Here, the presupposition (that I have a wife) triggered by the expression my wife is blocked, because it is stated in the antecedent of the conditional: That sentence doesn't imply that I have a wife. In the following example, it is not stated in the antecedent, so it is allowed to project, i.e. the sentence does imply that I have a wife.

  8. Entailment (linguistics) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entailment_(linguistics)

    If a sentence A entails a sentence B, sentence A cannot be true without B being true as well. [1] For instance, the English sentence "Pat is a fluffy cat" entails the sentence "Pat is a cat" since one cannot be a fluffy cat without being a cat. On the other hand, this sentence does not entail "Pat chases mice" since it is possible (if unlikely ...

  9. Implicature - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implicature

    Under this view, the sentence about Donovan would have the primary proposition "Donovan is poor and happy" and the secondary proposition "There is a contrast between poverty and happiness". The sentence about yewberry jelly contains the two propositions "Yewberry jelly will give you an awful stomachache" and "Yewberry jelly is toxic in the ...