Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development is a book on gender studies by American professor Carol Gilligan, published in 1982, which Harvard University Press calls "the little book that started a revolution". [1] In the book, Gilligan criticized Kohlberg's stages of moral development of children. Kohlberg's data showed ...
Carol Gilligan was raised in a Jewish family in New York City. [2] She was the only child of a lawyer, William Friedman, and nursery school teacher, Mabel Caminez.She attended the public Hunter Model School and the Walden School, [3] a progressive private school on Manhattan's Upper West Side and played piano.
Gilligan created this model as a critique of her mentor, developmental psychologist Lawrence Kohlberg's model of moral development. Gilligan observed that measuring moral development by Kohlberg's stages of moral development found boys to be more morally mature than girls, and this result held for adults as well (although when education is ...
Carol Gilligan; Moral development; References This page was last edited on 20 February 2020, at 03:03 ... Mobile view; Search. Search. Toggle the table of contents.
While conceptually grounded originally in the work of William G. Perry in cognitive (or intellectual) development [2] and Carol Gilligan in moral/personal development in women, [3] the Belenky, Clinchy, Goldberger, and Tarule discovered that existing developmental theories at the time did not address some issues and experiences that were common ...
Carol Gilligan famously championed the role of relationships as central to moral reasoning, and superior as a basis for understanding human choices than any prior linguistic or meta-ethical concept. This perspective is now commonly called the ethics of care .
Carol Gilligan's view is closer to an embodied view and emphasizes ethical relationships - necessarily between bodies - over universal ethical principles that require a "God's Eye view". Some ethicists emphasize the role of the ethicist to sort out right versus right in a given context.
Like Carol Gilligan, Noddings accepts that justice based approaches, which are supposed to be more masculine, are genuine alternatives to ethics of care. However, unlike Gilligan, Noddings's believes that caring, 'rooted in receptivity, relatedness, and responsiveness' is a more basic and preferable approach to ethics (Caring 1984, 2).