When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: holistic approach to afpa program evaluation

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Program evaluation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Program_evaluation

    Planning a program evaluation can be broken up into four parts: focusing the evaluation, collecting the information, using the information, and managing the evaluation. [28] Program evaluation involves reflecting on questions about evaluation purpose, what questions are necessary to ask, and what will be done with information gathered.

  3. Michael Quinn Patton - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Quinn_Patton

    Patton has written many books on the art and science of program evaluation, including Utilization-Focused Evaluation (4th ed., 2008), in which he emphasizes the importance of designing evaluations to ensure their usefulness, rather than simply creating long reports that may never get read or never result in any practical changes. He has written ...

  4. Holistic grading - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holistic_grading

    Holistic grading or holistic scoring, in standards-based education, is an approach to scoring essays using a simple grading structure that bases a grade on a paper's overall quality. [1] This type of grading, which is also described as nonreductionist grading, [ 2 ] contrasts with analytic grading, [ 3 ] which takes more factors into account ...

  5. Theory-driven evaluation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory-driven_evaluation

    Theory-driven evaluation (also theory-based evaluation) is an umbrella term for any approach to program evaluation that develops a theory of change and uses it to design, implement, analyze, and interpret findings from an evaluation. [1] [2] [3] More specifically, an evaluation is theory-driven if it: [4]

  6. Participatory evaluation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Participatory_evaluation

    Participatory evaluation is an approach to program evaluation. It provides for the active involvement of stakeholder in the program: providers, partners, beneficiaries, and any other interested parties. All involved decide how to frame the questions used to evaluate the program, and all decide how to measure outcomes and impact.

  7. Responsive evaluation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Responsive_evaluation

    This approach enables to evaluate the educational and other programs by comparing the program activity, the program uniqueness, and the social diversity of the people. The most important feature in the responsive evaluation is the responsiveness to main issues and problems, in particular those cases where people recognize at the site. [2]

  8. Evaluation and Program Planning - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evaluation_and_Program...

    Evaluation and Program Planning is a bimonthly peer-reviewed multidisciplinary social science journal covering program evaluation. It was established in 1974 by Jonathan A. Morell and Eugenie Walsh Flaherty and originally published by Pergamon Press . [ 1 ]

  9. CIPP evaluation model - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIPP_evaluation_model

    The CIPP evaluation model is a program evaluation model which was developed by Daniel Stufflebeam and colleagues in the 1960s. CIPP is an acronym for context, input, process and product. CIPP is a decision-focused approach to evaluation and emphasizes the systematic provision of information for program management and operation. [1]

  1. Ad

    related to: holistic approach to afpa program evaluation