When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Apodaca v. Oregon - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apodaca_v._Oregon

    The Court also rejected the argument that unanimity would protect the reasonable-doubt standard. If some jurors voted to acquit, the petitioners argued, they could not have been found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. But the Court rejected the idea that this requirement is found in the Sixth Amendment, because the reasonable-doubt standard ...

  3. Reasonable doubt - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasonable_doubt

    Beyond (a) reasonable doubt is a legal standard of proof required to validate a criminal conviction in most adversarial legal systems. [1] It is a higher standard of proof than the standard of balance of probabilities (US English: preponderance of the evidence) commonly used in civil cases because the stakes are much higher in a criminal case: a person found guilty can be deprived of liberty ...

  4. Burden of proof (law) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(law)

    For example, the presumption of innocence in a criminal case places a legal burden upon the prosecution to prove all elements of the offense (generally beyond a reasonable doubt), and to disprove all the defenses except for affirmative defenses in which the proof of non-existence of all affirmative defense(s) is not constitutionally required of ...

  5. Ruan v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruan_v._United_States

    United States against the government's requirement for the accused to prove he is "reasonable." The court also rejected the "bad-apple" argument (holding that the additional burden on the government to prove would allow doctors to escape criminal liability much more easily) by stating that such an argument could be applied to almost all cases.

  6. Presumption of innocence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presumption_of_innocence

    If reasonable doubt remains, the accused must be acquitted. The opposite system is a presumption of guilt. In many countries and under many legal systems, including common law and civil law systems (not to be confused with the other kind of civil law, which deals with non-criminal legal issues), the presumption of innocence is a legal right of ...

  7. The Jay-Z through-line mirrors this season’s murder trial in subsequent “Reasonable Doubt” episodes, such as “Guilty Until Proven Innocent” (205), “This Can’t Be Life” (206) and ...

  8. Here’s When Every Episode of ‘Reasonable Doubt ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/every-episode-reasonable-doubt...

    Here's the full release schedule for Reasonable Doubt season 2:. Reasonable Doubt's second season will have a total of 10 episodes, all streamable on Hulu.Episodes will come out every Thursday ...

  9. No case to answer - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_case_to_answer

    In a criminal trial, the prosecution has to prove the case against the accused beyond the reasonable doubt. According to the section 200(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, when there is no evidence to prove the case levelled against the accused, then the court has to record a verdict of acquittal without calling accused's defence. [7]