When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: paternity test without dad's consent letter

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. DNA paternity testing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_paternity_testing

    DNA paternity testing is the use of DNA profiles to determine whether an individual is the biological parent of another individual. Paternity testing can be especially important when the rights and duties of the father are in issue and a child's paternity is in doubt. Tests can also determine the likelihood of someone being a biological ...

  3. Dad faked DNA test to avoid paying child support - AOL

    www.aol.com/dad-faked-dna-test-avoid-103231600.html

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  4. Man forced to pay child support even though DNA test proves ...

    www.aol.com/news/man-forced-pay-child-support...

    A Florida man has been forced to pay child support even though a DNA test proved that he is not the child's biological father, First Coast News reports. Last year, Joseph Sinawa, of St. Augustine ...

  5. Bachelor's Clayton Echard Clarifies 'Timeline' of Paternity Test

    www.aol.com/entertainment/bachelors-clayton-e...

    Clayton Echard is sharing receipts amid his ongoing alleged paternity scandal. “This is the timeline. The truth will always set you free,” the former Bachelor, 30, wrote via Instagram Story on ...

  6. Non-paternity event - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-paternity_event

    Gilding states that those data show only the incidence of non-paternity in which disputed parentage was the reason for paternity testing. [1] [25] In situations that disputed parentage was the reason for the paternity testing, there were higher levels with an incidence of 17% to 33% (median of 26.9%). Most at risk of parental discrepancy were ...

  7. Hermesmann v. Seyer - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermesmann_v._Seyer

    Hermesmann v. Seyer (State of Kansas ex rel. Hermesmann v. Seyer, 847 P.2d 1273 (Kan. 1993)) [1] was a precedent-setting Kansas, United States, case in which Colleen Hermesmann successfully argued that a woman is entitled to sue the father of her child for child support even if conception occurred as a result of a criminal act committed by the woman.