Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
A formula for computing the trigonometric identities for the one-third angle exists, but it requires finding the zeroes of the cubic equation 4x 3 − 3x + d = 0, where is the value of the cosine function at the one-third angle and d is the known value of the cosine function at the full angle.
Define the Hadamard canonical factors ():= = / Entire functions of finite order have Hadamard's canonical representation: [1] = = (/) where are those roots of that are not zero (), is the order of the zero of at = (the case = being taken to mean ()), a polynomial (whose degree we shall call ), and is the smallest non-negative integer such that ...
If the denominator, b, is multiplied by additional factors of 2, the sine and cosine can be derived with the half-angle formulas. For example, 22.5° (π /8 rad) is half of 45°, so its sine and cosine are: [11]
One important result concerning infinite products is that every entire function f(z) (that is, every function that is holomorphic over the entire complex plane) can be factored into an infinite product of entire functions, each with at most a single root. In general, if f has a root of order m at the origin and has other complex roots at u 1, u ...
It is clear that any finite set {} of points in the complex plane has an associated polynomial = whose zeroes are precisely at the points of that set. The converse is a consequence of the fundamental theorem of algebra: any polynomial function () in the complex plane has a factorization = (), where a is a non-zero constant and {} is the set of zeroes of ().
The uniqueness and the zeros of trigonometric series was an active area of research in 19th century Europe. First, Georg Cantor proved that if a trigonometric series is convergent to a function on the interval [,], which is identically zero, or more generally, is nonzero on at most finitely many points, then the coefficients of the series are all zero.
The standard part function can also be defined for infinite hyperreal numbers as follows: If x is a positive infinite hyperreal number, set st(x) to be the extended real number +, and likewise, if x is a negative infinite hyperreal number, set st(x) to be (the idea is that an infinite hyperreal number should be smaller than the "true" absolute ...
where all elements having a factor of 3 or 2 (or both) are removed. It can be seen that the right side is being sieved. Repeating infinitely for 1 p s {\displaystyle {\frac {1}{p^{s}}}} where p {\displaystyle p} is prime, we get: