When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: vicarious liability vs respondeat superior property protection policy

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Vicarious liability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicarious_liability

    Vicarious liability is a form of a strict, secondary liability that arises under the common law doctrine of agency, respondeat superior, the responsibility of the superior for the acts of their subordinate or, in a broader sense, the responsibility of any third party that had the "right, ability, or duty to control" the activities of a violator.

  3. Secondary liability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secondary_liability

    One of the theories widely accepted as a basis for liability in copyright infringement cases is vicarious liability. [7] The concept of vicarious liability was developed in the Second Circuit as an extension of the common law doctrine of agency – respondeat superior (the responsibility of the superior for the acts of their subordinate ...

  4. Respondeat superior - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Respondeat_superior

    Respondeat superior (Latin: "let the master answer"; plural: respondeant superiores) is a doctrine that a party is responsible for (and has vicarious liability for) acts of his agents. [ 1 ] : 794 For example, in the United States, there are circumstances when an employer is liable for acts of employees performed within the course of their ...

  5. Outline of tort law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outline_of_tort_law

    Vicarious liability – A form of strict secondary liability arising from respondeat superior. The responsibility of the superior for the acts of their subordinates, under which, they are responsible for negligent acts committed by their employees during the course of their employment.

  6. Qui facit per alium facit per se - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qui_facit_per_alium_facit...

    It is a maxim often stated in discussing the liability of employer for the act of employee in terms of vicarious liability." [ 3 ] According to this maxim, if in the nature of things, the master is obliged to perform the duties by employing servants, he is responsible for their act in the same way that he is responsible for his own acts.

  7. Other structures coverage: If you have any detached structures on your property, such as sheds, greenhouses or fences, the other structures portion of your policy ensures they are protected in the ...

  8. Negligence in employment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negligence_in_employment

    Vicarious liability is a separate theory of liability, which provides that an employer is liable for the torts of an employee under an agency theory, even if the employer did nothing wrong. The principle is that the acts of an agent of the company are assumed, by law, to be the acts of the company itself, provided the tortfeasor was acting ...

  9. Ashcroft v. Iqbal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashcroft_v._Iqbal

    The Court found that according to precedent, government officials could not be held liable for the unconstitutional conduct of their subordinates because of respondeat superior and also because vicarious liability was inapplicable to Bivens and Section 1983 suits, a plaintiff must plead that each government-official defendant, through the ...

  1. Ad

    related to: vicarious liability vs respondeat superior property protection policy