Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In the United States, states have differing nudity and public decency laws. [4] In most states, state law prohibits exposure of the genitals and/or the female nipples in a public place, while in other states simple nudity is legal, but evidence of intent to shock, arouse or offend other persons (lewd conduct) is evidence of prohibited conduct.
Women in six U.S. states are now effectively allowed to be topless in public, according to a new ruling by the U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals.. The decision stems from a multiyear legal battle ...
In the United States, individual states have primary jurisdiction in matters of public morality.The topfreedom movement has claimed success in a few instances in persuading some state and federal courts to overturn some state laws on the basis of sex discrimination or equal protection, arguing that a woman should be free to expose her chest (i.e., be topless) in any context in which a man can ...
In 2006, St. Martin was charged with rape of a child with force, indecent assault and battery on a child under 14 years of age, dissemination of child pornography and open and gross lewdness and ...
In American legal jargon, lascivious is a semi-technical term indicating immoral sexual actions and in certain cases, words or thoughts. It is often used in the legal description of criminal acts in which some sort of sexual activity is prohibited. The legal definition of the term varies greatly across jurisdictions, and has evolved ...
Joe Budden has been charged with lewdness after an incident in his apartment building.. The rapper and media personality, 44, was charged Dec. 4 after a neighbor allegedly saw him standing ...
Cover of an undated American edition of Fanny Hill, c. 1910 The 18th century book Fanny Hill has been subject to obscenity trials at various times (image: plate XI: The bathing party; La baignade). The sale and distribution of obscene materials had been prohibited in most American states since the early 19th century, and by federal law since 1873.
The state, however, argues that the performance at R House was unlawful because there was nudity involved that was presented in a “vulgar or indecent manner.”