When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Gibbons v. Ogden - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibbons_v._Ogden

    Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. (9 Wheat.) 1 (1824), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States which held that the power to regulate interstate commerce, which is granted to the US Congress by the Commerce Clause of the US Constitution, encompasses the power to regulate navigation.

  3. Marshall Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marshall_Court

    Gibbons v. Ogden (1824): In an opinion written by Chief Justice Marshall, the court struck down a New York law that had granted a monopoly on steamship operation in the state of New York. In its decision, the court upheld Congress's ability to regulate commerce under the Commerce Clause. [14] Worcester v.

  4. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Marshall ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Gibbons v. Ogden: 22 U.S. 1 (1824) Congressional power to regulate interstate commerce Osborn v. Bank of the United States: 22 U.S. 738 (1824) scope of Article III jurisdiction; interpretation of the 11th Amendment: The Antelope: 23 U.S. 66 (1825) The Supreme Court's initial consideration of the legitimacy of the international slave trade ...

  5. On March 2, 1824, the Supreme Court ruled in Gibbons v. Ogden, holding that Congress may regulate interstate commerce.

  6. Article Six of the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Six_of_the_United...

    Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) was another influential case involving the supremacy clause. The state of New York had granted Aaron Ogden a monopoly over the steamboat business in the Hudson River. The other party, Thomas Gibbons, had obtained a federal permit under the Coastal Licensing Act to perform the same task. The Supreme Court upheld the ...

  7. Dormant Commerce Clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dormant_Commerce_Clause

    See Western & Southern Life Ins. v. State Board of California, 451 U.S. 648 (1981). In this case the Dormant Commerce Clause is no longer "dormant" and the issue is a Commerce Clause issue, requiring a determination of whether Congress has approved, preempted, or left untouched the state law at issue.

  8. History of the Supreme Court of the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Supreme...

    Maryland (1819), the Court ruled that the interstate commerce clause and other clauses permitted Congress to create a national bank, even though the power to create a bank is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution. Similarly, in Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), the Court found that the interstate commerce clause permitted Congress to regulate ...

  9. Aaron Ogden - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Ogden

    Aaron Ogden (December 3, 1756 – April 19, 1839) was an American soldier, lawyer, United States Senator and the fifth governor of New Jersey. [1] Ogden is perhaps best known today as the complainant in Gibbons v. Ogden which destroyed the monopoly power of steamboats on the Hudson River in 1824. [2] [3]