When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: intelligent design theory vs evolution system

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Intelligent design - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_design

    In the first, David K. DeWolf, John G. West and Casey Luskin, all of the Discovery Institute, argued that intelligent design is a valid scientific theory, the Jones court should not have addressed the question of whether it was a scientific theory, and that the Kitzmiller decision will have no effect at all on the development and adoption of ...

  3. Intelligent design and science - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_design_and_science

    The intelligent design movement states that there is a debate among scientists about whether life evolved. The movement stresses the importance of recognizing the existence of this supposed debate, seeking to convince the public, politicians, and cultural leaders that schools should "Teach the Controversy". [1]

  4. Irreducible complexity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irreducible_complexity

    The eye is frequently cited by intelligent design and creationism advocates as a purported example of irreducible complexity. Behe used the "development of the eye problem" as evidence for intelligent design in Darwin's Black Box. Although Behe acknowledged that the evolution of the larger anatomical features of the eye have been well-explained ...

  5. List of scientific bodies explicitly rejecting intelligent design

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientific_bodies...

    A 2006 statement on the teaching of evolution: "Some bills seek to discredit evolution by emphasizing so-called "flaws" in the theory of evolution or "disagreements" within the scientific community. Others insist that teachers have absolute freedom within their classrooms and cannot be disciplined for teaching non-scientific "alternatives" to ...

  6. Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area...

    His simulation modelling of evolution with David Snoke described in a 2004 paper had been listed by the Discovery Institute amongst claimed "Peer-Reviewed & Peer-Edited Scientific Publications Supporting the Theory of Intelligent Design", [29] but under oath he accepted that it showed that the biochemical systems it described could evolve ...

  7. Michael Behe - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Behe

    Behe was forced to concede that "there are no peer reviewed articles by anyone advocating for intelligent design supported by pertinent experiments or calculations which provide detailed rigorous accounts of how intelligent design of any biological system occurred" [43] and that his definition of 'theory' as applied to intelligent design was so ...

  8. Phillip E. Johnson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phillip_E._Johnson

    Johnson is one of the authors of the Discovery Institute's Wedge Document and its "Teach the Controversy" campaign, which attempts to cast doubt on the validity of the theory of evolution, its acceptance within the scientific community, and reduce its role in public school science curricula while promoting intelligent design. The "Teach the ...

  9. Outline of the creation–evolution controversy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outline_of_the_creation...

    Evolution as theory and fact; Level of support for evolution; Teach the Controversy; Wedge strategy; Supporters of evolution: A Scientific Support for Darwinism; List of scientific societies rejecting intelligent design; Project Steve; Clergy Letter Project; Supporters of creation or intelligent design A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism ...