Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
An effort was made in 2012 to repeal the requirement for dog licenses in the state of New Hampshire. [21] The effort did not succeed at the time due in part to testimony provided by the son of the chair of the committee who was a veterinarian testifying against the bill. [21] Funds from the tax for dog licenses go towards the state veterinarian.
The city of Asheville's animal ordinance requires that dogs must be licensed annually. But how many people actually adhere to the rule?
Title 14 CFR – Aeronautics and Space is one of the fifty titles that make up the United States Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). Title 14 is the principal set of rules and regulations (sometimes called administrative law) issued by the Department of Transportation and Federal Aviation Administration, federal agencies of the United States which oversee Aeronautics and Space.
Flying UA/drones above some parks, coasts, and ports including Tottori Sand Dunes is restricted by the by-laws in some prefectures of Japan. [citation needed] Like many other countries, it is a kind of trespass to fly UA/drones indoors, near above the dwellings, or near above its surrounding soil without the permission of a person with ...
Rule one of flying with a dog: Don't just show up at the airport with your dog! Beyond that, simply knowing an airline's rules and regulations and following a few best practices will make travel ...
Dec. 30—NASHVILLE — Tennessee homeowners facing bankruptcy will have better financial protection from creditors under a new state law taking effect New Year's Day that raises the state's ...
The Real ID Act of 2005 (stylized as REAL ID Act of 2005) is an Act of Congress that establishes requirements that driver licenses and identification cards issued by U.S. states and territories must satisfy to be accepted for accessing federal government facilities, nuclear power plants, and for boarding airline flights in the United States.
The low cost of unmanned aerial vehicles (also called drones) in the 2000s re-raised legal questions regarding whose permission is required to fly at low altitudes: the landowner, the FAA, or both. [12] There has never been a direct challenge to the federal government's vesting of the right for citizens to travel through navigable airspace.