Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
More than 100 pages use this file. The following list shows the first 100 pages that use this file only. A full list is available. User:Brightstarshines/sandbox; User:Cmbuff149/citing sources; User:Dr Ashton/course wizard/Timeline; User:Susan.nls/sandbox; User talk:Mpatnaik94; Wikipedia:GLAM/BBC's 100 Women/Events and Workshops/BBC Glasgow
A typical DBQ is a packet of several original sources (anywhere from three to sixteen), labeled by letters (beginning with "Document A" or "Source A") or numbers. Usually all but one or two source(s) are textual, with the other source(s) being graphic (usually a political cartoon, map, or poster if primary and a chart or graph if secondary). In ...
If a sentence or paragraph is footnoted with a source, adding new material that is not supported by the existing source to it, without a source for the new text, is highly misleading if placed so as to appear that the cited source supports it. For example, when editing text originally reading The sun is pretty big. Notes ^
English: License source: file COPYING in svn. Licensing This work is free software ; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU Affero General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation ; either version 3 of the License, or any later version.
Online content analysis or online textual analysis refers to a collection of research techniques used to describe and make inferences about online material through systematic coding and interpretation. Online content analysis is a form of content analysis for analysis of Internet-based communication.
The following other wikis use this file: Usage on en.wikisource.org Index:Analysis and Assessment of Gateway Process.pdf; Page:Analysis and Assessment of Gateway Process.pdf/1
Everything in that paragraph deals with the same, single subject from the same source and can therefore be supported by a single inline citation. The inline citation could be placed at any sensible location, but the end of the paragraph is the most common choice.
Use this template to tag information or analysis that you believe is improperly or unnecessarily supported by a primary source, so that other editors can see whether this use is appropriate and/or replace it with a citation to a stronger, secondary source. Primary sources may be used on Wikipedia, but they need to be handled with care. Template parameters [Edit template data] This template ...