When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: the 16th amendment summary

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixteenth_Amendment_to_the...

    The Sixteenth Amendment (Amendment XVI) to the United States Constitution allows Congress to levy an income tax without apportioning it among the states on the basis of population. It was passed by Congress in 1909 in response to the 1895 Supreme Court case of Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.

  3. Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pollock_v._Farmers'_Loan_...

    Baker, 485 U.S. 505 (1988) (in part) Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Company, 157 U.S. 429 (1895), affirmed on rehearing, 158 U.S. 601 (1895), was a landmark case of the Supreme Court of the United States. In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court struck down the income tax imposed by the Wilson–Gorman Tariff Act for being an unapportioned direct ...

  4. Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brushaber_v._Union_Pacific...

    Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., 240 U.S. 1 (1916), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the validity of a tax statute called the Revenue Act of 1913, also known as the Tariff Act, Ch. 16, 38 Stat. 166 (October 3, 1913), enacted pursuant to Article I, section 8, clause 1 of, and the Sixteenth Amendment to, the United States Constitution, allowing a ...

  5. Tax protester Sixteenth Amendment arguments - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_protester_Sixteenth...

    Tax protester Sixteenth Amendment arguments are assertions that the imposition of the U.S. federal income tax is illegal because the Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which reads "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration ...

  6. Revenue Act of 1913 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revenue_Act_of_1913

    Oscar Underwood. The Revenue Act of 1913, also known as the Underwood Tariff or the Underwood-Simmons Act (ch. 16, 38 Stat. 114), re-established a federal income tax in the United States and substantially lowered tariff rates. The act was sponsored by Representative Oscar Underwood, passed by the 63rd United States Congress, and signed into law ...

  7. Tax protester constitutional arguments - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_protester...

    Sixteenth Amendment ratification arguments have been rejected in every court case where they have been raised and have been identified as legally frivolous. [ 6 ] Some protesters have argued that because the Sixteenth Amendment does not contain the words " repeal " or "repealed", the Amendment is ineffective to change the law.

  8. The Law that Never Was - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Law_that_Never_Was

    The Law That Never Was: The Fraud of the 16th Amendment and Personal Income Tax is a 1985 book by William J. Benson and Martin J. "Red" Beckman which claims that the Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, commonly known as the income tax amendment, was never properly ratified. In 2007, and again in 2009, Benson's contentions ...

  9. Moore v. United States (2024) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore_v._United_States_(2024)

    The Mandatory Repatriation Tax (MRT) does not exceed Congress’s constitutional authority. Moore v. United States, 602 U.S. ___ (2024), was a United States Supreme Court case related to the ability of the federal government to tax unrealized gains as income. The Supreme Court upheld the Mandatory Repatriation Tax (MRT).