Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Satanic Verses controversy, also known as the Rushdie Affair, was a controversy sparked by the 1988 publication of Salman Rushdie's novel The Satanic Verses.It centered on the novel's references to the Satanic Verses (apocryphal verses of the Quran), and came to include a larger debate about censorship and religious violence.
The Satanic Verses (1988) Salman Rushdie: 1988 Novel Banned for blasphemy against Islam. Salman received a fatwa for his alleged blasphemy [31] Naree (1992) Humayun Azad: 1992 Criticism Banned in Bangladesh in 1995, [32] though the ban was later lifted in 2000. [33] Lajja (1993) Taslima Nasrin: 1993 Novel Banned in Bangladesh, [34] [35] and a ...
The Satanic Verses: Salman Rushdie: Portrayal of Muhammad in a negative light 1988 — — — Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark (series) Alvin Schwartz: Unsuited for age group, violence 1981–1991 24 7 1 A Separate Peace: John Knowles: Sexual content 1959 — — — Sex: Madonna: Sexual content 1992 — — 18 Sex Education: Jenny Davis ...
People can be afraid of books, and crucially, they can make others afraid of them, too.View Entire Post ›
India’s ban on the import of author Salman Rushdie’s The Satanic Verses has been overturned by the Delhi High Court due to a remarkable situation – the original notification cannot be found ...
The Satanic Verses is the fourth novel from the Indian-British writer Salman Rushdie. First published in September 1988, the book was inspired by the life of the Islamic prophet Muhammad . As with his previous books, Rushdie used magical realism and relied on contemporary events and people to create his characters.
The 1988 publication of the novel The Satanic Verses, by Salman Rushdie, was followed by angry demonstrations and riots around the world by followers of political Islam who considered it blasphemous. In the United Kingdom, book burnings were staged in the cities of Bolton and Bradford. [197]
His remarks are worth taking a moment to read in full, but most saliently, he wrote, “I certainly find a display from the Satanic Temple objectionable. It stands in direct opposition to my faith ...