When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia : When to use or avoid "other stuff exists" arguments

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:When_to_use_or...

    In cases such as these, an "other stuff exists"–type of argument or rationale may provide the necessary precedent for style and phraseology. For instance, upon the sudden death of the actor Heath Ledger in 2008, a discussion broke out about adding "the late" before his name in the article on The Dark Knight , a film in which he had a major role.

  3. JavaScript syntax - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JavaScript_syntax

    The rest parameter must be the final named parameter in the function's parameter list. It will be assigned an Array containing any arguments passed to the function in excess of the other named parameters. In other words, it gets "the rest" of the arguments passed to the function (hence the name).

  4. Wikipedia : Arguments to avoid on discussion pages

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arguments_to...

    Unlike a deletion discussion, where people "vote" with terms like "keep," "delete," and a variety of other actions, talk page discussions are not as formal and can follow any number of structures. The examples below use terms like "include" and "remove" just to get the point across. But a real discussion may appear quite differently.

  5. Why is there anything at all? - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why_is_there_anything_at_all?

    Philosopher Brian Leftow has argued that the question cannot have a causal explanation (as any cause must itself have a cause) or a contingent explanation (as the factors giving the contingency must pre-exist), and that if there is an answer, it must be something that exists necessarily (i.e., something that just exists, rather than is caused ...

  6. Wikipedia talk:When to use or avoid "other stuff exists ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:When_to_use...

    The new title is "When to use or avoid 'other stuff exists' arguments". If the answer to "when to use" was "never", that would be a strange title to use to make things clearer - surely something like "Avoid 'other stuff exists' arguments" would have been far better. That conversation only closed on May 6 - less than two weeks ago.

  7. Wikipedia : Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arguments_to...

    This page details arguments that are commonly seen in deletion discussions that have been identified as generally unsound and unconvincing. These are arguments that should generally be avoided – or at the least supplemented with a better-grounded rationale for the position taken, whether that be "keep", "delete" or some other objective.

  8. Help:Conditional expressions - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Conditional_expressions

    On the other hand, in the expressions evaluated by #expr and #ifexpr, Boolean operators like and, or, and not interpret the numerical value 0 as false and any other number as true. In terms of output, Boolean operations return 1 for a true value and 0 for false (and these are treated as ordinary numbers by the numerical operators).

  9. Wikipedia:Try not to leave it a stub - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Try_not_to_leave...

    Wikipedia is a very different place now than it was in 2001. In the early days of Wikipedia, volunteers could pick almost any notable topic and start an article about it. . There were some basic guidelines for article content, but they were not as well developed or as consistently enforced as they are n