When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: nc court date by defendant name search free white pages

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Phil Berger Jr. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phil_Berger_Jr.

    Philip Berger Jr. (born March 26, 1972) is an American lawyer who has served as an associate justice of the North Carolina Supreme Court since 2021. Berger was elected to a seat on the North Carolina Court of Appeals in 2016, defeating incumbent Judge Linda Stephens. [1]

  3. Klopfer v. North Carolina - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klopfer_v._North_Carolina

    Klopfer v. North Carolina, 386 U.S. 213 (1967), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court involving the application of the Speedy Trial Clause of the United States Constitution in state court proceedings.

  4. J. D. B. v. North Carolina - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._D._B._v._North_Carolina

    J. D. B. v. North Carolina, 564 U.S. 261 (2011), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that age and mental status is relevant when determining police custody for Miranda purposes, overturning its prior ruling from seven years before. J.

  5. North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Carolina_State_Board...

    North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. Federal Trade Commission , 574 U.S. 494 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case on the scope of immunity from US antitrust law . The Supreme Court held that a state occupational licensing board that was primarily composed of persons active in the market it regulates has immunity from ...

  6. Heien v. North Carolina - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heien_v._North_Carolina

    Heien v. North Carolina, 574 U.S. 54 (2014), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, ruling that a police officer's reasonable mistake of law can provide the individualized suspicion required by the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution to justify a traffic stop.

  7. Packingham v. North Carolina - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Packingham_v._North_Carolina

    Packingham v. North Carolina, 582 U.S. 98 (2017), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a North Carolina statute that prohibited registered sex offenders from using social media websites was unconstitutional because it violated the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which protects freedom of speech.