Ads
related to: examples of character witness letters for court decisions
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
impeach or strengthen the credibility of a witness. Character may be a substantive issue in defamation suits, in lawsuits alleging negligent hiring or negligent entrustment, in child custody cases, as well as in loss of consortium cases; character evidence is thus admissible to prove the substantive issues that arise in these types of lawsuits.
Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. 441 (1972), was a United States Supreme Court decision that ruled on the issue of whether the government's grant of immunity from prosecution can compel a witness to testify over an assertion of the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
The silent witness rule is the use of "substitutions" when referring to sensitive information in the United States open courtroom jury trial system. An example of a substitution method is the use of code-words on a "key card", to which witnesses and the jury would refer during the trial, but which the public would not have access to.
Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the prosecution's failure to inform the jury that a witness had been promised not to be prosecuted in exchange for his testimony was a failure to fulfill the duty to present all material evidence to the jury, and constituted a violation of due process, requiring a new trial. [1]
If the government does not deliver a witness's Jencks statement to the defendant, the court may strike the witness's testimony or declare a mistrial. [13] The Jencks Act has been characterized as intending to assure defendants of their right to confront their accusers under the Sixth Amendment. [14] Its provisions are not a constitutional ...
Witnesses for now will be referenced in court papers using pseudonyms, the judge said. Trump has repeatedly attacked judges, prosecutors and some known witnesses in the four criminal cases against ...
The decision articulated the "two-way street" approach, that "trials be run as a 'search for truth'" without either side maintaining "'poker game' secrecy for its own witnesses". [9] Along with these decisions that were specific to the discovery process, the Supreme Court broadened the general constitutional rights for defendants in the 1967 ...
A new Supreme Court case Sackett vs EPA is leaning toward a disregard for the environment as a whole, by dangerously putting property rights over already established environmental laws. The case ...